No. 21-389
Sergio Momox-Caselis, et al. v. Tara Donohue, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: anderson-v-liberty-lobby appellate-review civil-procedure judicial-procedure liberty-lobby ninth-circuit standard-of-review standards summary-judgment supervisory-power
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals departed from the accepted and usual course of the standards established by this Court in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986) for reviewing an order granting summary judgment
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals departed from the accepted and usual course of the standards established by this Court in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986) for reviewing an order granting summary judgment such that this Court’s exercise of its supervisory power is warranted?
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent Tara Donohue, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Sergio Momox-Caselis, et al.
Marjorie L Hauf — H&P Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Marjorie L Hauf — H&P Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Tara Donohue, et al.
Thomas D. Dillard Jr. — Olson, Cannon, Gormley & Stoberski, Respondent
Thomas D. Dillard Jr. — Olson, Cannon, Gormley & Stoberski, Respondent