Whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's civil rights claims against the defendants

ESTION(S) PRESENTE! : : Address WE Anizorn. District D Kee | mel tr COSe NO 4:19 ~ is sick Couet’S efusal +o $0 -4219-CY “OSA A PHY Claims sedrrert, Fe ) Tmaristo TA Sates Plant FF eS 9 . priston mont and Wedel scar dn cand SELLE Address te Count eM! . ; 4 denials 40 Pile nee ee aes R's OCC axe to be Anzone cil couct 3) Address HE : atl \cC3) on TAM Red cell x H) Adoress constitekioncd yiolationG) of thi § 5) Address duc, Refuse! te Pile this case Now tree Anes 40 cw Courtse Address WE Distal ct courts ( Arizone) Refusal of peages 26°38) d ° : Gee Appr’ “A 7) Address use oflesel te“ ‘onyucal andity"UsciN Wis CaSe bo gismi Sal oe Dekendant® unger orricisl Caps city Filed infor © ch. aaolt. J) Adaress 4uc pristeading Slatement * Corso succeed as” matter of Lars Cte hers An Sedge uses Quied2 Now fo Pcesent dekenses te DrsmiSs An Cendent evil achonProviding A ecense VS for fac DePevdew!e) not te dul 9e