No. 21-5415

Jarvis Brown v. Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-review standing supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States District Court and United States Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the Petitioner's case

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : Inlhectherthe. LUneled Slrlos diehict-Caurtand Unvled Soles —— aE HOS Udo Hote dl (ein) Rw ulhethor tho Uncted States ddistict: Courtue andl United Gbolos Cart of Fpseal Sheueaes inleroSt fell aophed tho Loutl alfa and ounchidtnr b ‘hy cage ithectly ? whether the Unted Gales Dichicl Cawtpudyo. ang Uoited Slates Cart at Appeals) 5%r. Fuhpes dijo! ad te gt ordre Whethor the Pbtono 1 a bthzon ara ale the Petharer 18 biel and qe glen eat doi sion , 9 | Sus F Ben, Rie Orleans frrish Short Office Martin tls Gusman Short? Orloons Parith dustret Ptornoy Loon A, Connizzovo dr. Dine? Atty. 5 Alou! Orleans Police. Depovinnont Ronald Suns Chief 5 berg Cantrell et; of. Orlaans farasts Croniel Lad gies 7 Kart K. Herman Ofeans Barish Onmingl Cat Section Z."; jedan Rosemony Ledef ef; al, Lanta tev daurt of Appoaks ; oye , | forndt-d, doknson otal Lansionn Supreme Cast jdushe Mandi E Campbell Frusto. Attonep Servi Thompsan ealfrurte Klee fublic Deterders OFiceGanes M. LeBlanc otretar! of L.d,0,0, RELATED CASES | United Kates vs. Dred alt Unded Shales us. Olana oo JURESSETE ON 4q CONSTE TUTE ANAL, ANA STATUTORY PROUESTONS TRY OUES =) STATEMENT OF THE OAS , 8 REASONS FOR GRANTENG THE WIRE? q CON CLUSTON 10 SENDEX TO APPENMABIES Rocewe, from the Lawor USDC please. thea refuse to provide me wih copes and gone of yi legal mals Howe boon Bion ui dhe Badertory ne of Louisiana | yf oo TABLE OF fummoRzrres (ere a ££ LS United Shles y, dred Saft | United Sobes v. lon | Lncludes mani hor ays in orypined Cit chon Campin STATES AND RULES 18 80,8342 and man) ther Camporup faites and rubs dryynal oni seton Complaunt OTHER. | 5. Su Prem” AOUeT OF THE wMlETep SHES PETE TION FOR WET OF CERTPORAREE PETCTENER Regpecthilly prays thet o.uirtt of Cortioran sue reyieul tne judgement belo. ORENDONS BELO For Cases from fedorod code The opinion of the Unded Sates court oP appeals appears ot Aopendix___ to the Pottfian ond is Hos been desisnated fy publeeaton bit @ nt uct roporkd The Opttion oF the Uneted Stles dictact court agpeard at yestie th the pottan and nn Ne. it dened access ba, Ly Lyba L hat Pty neers bg nts did other Chil actor we) @. + The date on uilich the Uneked Sfoles Court of Appeals ahead Tif CAE WL ink T, 200f Caw Mos, GIFS Tic pristlon oP ths Court 08 muloked under 98 USC. § 1254 (1), CONSTETUTLONAL ANd STATUTORY PROMIZEMNS LEM YOLUED US, Cone 5* fmndmeytt U1 Const 14% Amendment LS Cont, B* Anon dant Lo, Yate Const Art 1 Becton 3 Ln, Gate Const: Art | Section 2 Lo, Sate Conch Ad: | Sedfar 0 La Eke Const Ad | geebone 92, dee 18 U.S. 894g a STATEMENT (OFTHE CASE Or fiprit 83 QO at appa, Si17 pm.» petitioner Gorns Fi Broun wins asresed in pornection wath Seounts of anm-nbbery of fa, 2S, 4:04.35 leount of etess doujee fraud of La. £8, Mi704(EXS) ; Jeamt OF possesbn oF myn of La. RS, 40:90b, The one, / load ‘Nor Guitt’'-0 al aS , Baty Meaol, ulronatul ) Beil an iharstiukena! under 1 eace ae violation of thew constdution amendments , aug) Sateffedval, Facts, and oP wep God abe lahore 16 -Foreuer prera ie gis AS King [itn Zin violation oF their Constrtuation of Uacted Safes 1st ohh 5* Lhe 38k 13 and Me Arencimerts eludes all other Amerdinont Hel A Fee, Buguse 4o/shauld ha, Er violets OF Laws they hove wihuch they dort Fallow query case on with then System) WestLau! and Léustods aw ofl contradicts flan Se’ ond Clg Fins . En violation of Facts L hous Sou ne fo oven ml under prasiice OF (oad abaue ond heavenly-ho h nl Babine and in Ae ulell as yndor the ULS vs. Dred Seat decision tay den blacke/broung or a roy ict ty ra mprisonmert under tnond. Armond. and 134 Ametdmont wore thut-han only conuietthar crti zens Ln yiolaticn of Goad above. ue His bong dopuidl rua-freedoms: 4rm-wetees tye Sy sb i a odie tel Dae Sa HED MY Me 8, — REASOUS FOR GRATING TE HeTeTean/ L) ZC hove od abare auion alts / Suomi alts 40 Froodlrns afin bf an the pursurt Pome vei mre Equalrtss ol Bod abare planet ear... ~~. 2 DT om vosider Block snsn(tiny ond not

Docket Entries

2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Jarvis J. Brown
Jarvis J. Brown — Petitioner
Jarvis J. Brown — Petitioner