No. 21-5412

Alfred E. Caraffa v. California Housing Securities, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights due-process medical-care prison-conditions retaliation
Latest Conference: 2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by the prison's alleged practices of law library access denial, lack of legal assistance, and failure to provide adequate medical care

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1) Address We Duc praces® oF Law Violet vn | oe Lt Sting dhe DEF ended) UN dec the wren) Comb WY 2) Add\ress We Ue8-C_A. Violeton of Duc Process co Lec Under Sechiuns 19 ase) 3) Address WE VioleHon of Abe Py eat Arend ment Aus BEATESS te government qrievencts. Ly) Address coctteronel Health Serv: ces ¢.\4-8) Soilure #O provide prepare medtel eae. S) Address corrections! teeth servicks EHS) red tom malprechice urols/°S* (stoking of Rivod SAMQIES under Fel se med veel ArEotmuvts) 6) Address cotreettonel dealts Services E H+) Med ee) Ma) prec bree Violette ni (Teng Rlood sample For prj Aids est) “J) Address Co rrechlonol Health services (HS) Yealure Xp xttet Maditr| Condi Lion of QYNEecomasha

Docket Entries

2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-08-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Alfred E. Caraffa
Alfred E. Caraffa — Petitioner