| 25A909 |
William Hudson v. Delaware |
Delaware |
2026-02-12 |
Application |
|
criminal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review postconviction-relief pro-se-litigant state-court-review |
Question not identified. |
| 25-6552 |
Angeliina Lynn Lawson v. Jonathan David Lawson |
Tenth Circuit |
2026-01-12 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights equal-protection fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant removal-jurisdiction |
Whether 28 U.S.C. §1443(1) permits removal to federal court when a pro se litigant with disabilities alleges systemic discrimination, retaliation, and… |
| 25-6531 |
Rafael Jorge v. Marie Adler |
First Circuit |
2026-01-09 |
Pending |
IFP |
appellate-procedure district-court judicial-discretion jurisdictional-deadline notice-of-appeal pro-se-litigant |
Whether a court of appeals can dismiss an appeal by a pro se litigant for failing to file a Notice of Appeal within 30 days of entry of judgment by th… |
| 25-6408 |
Lynette Cooper v. City of Baltimore, Maryland, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-12-19 |
Pending |
IFP |
chemical-battery civil-rico due-process judicial-review pro-se-litigant witness-tampering |
Did the Court of Appeals violate the Petitioner's Due Process rights by affirming the District Court's sua sponte dismissal of a detailed civil RICO c… |
| 25A726 |
Orna Shaposhnik v. Quality Loan Service Corp., et al. |
California |
2025-12-19 |
Application |
|
ada-accommodations cognitive-impairment jurisdictional-extension pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process supreme-court-procedure |
Whether a pro se litigant with documented cognitive and neurological impairments is entitled to reasonable accommodations and an extension of time to … |
| 25A722 |
Richard R. Lawless v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-12-18 |
Application |
|
appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process frivolous-dismissal pro-se-litigant section-1915 |
Whether a federal appellate court can summarily dismiss a pro se civil rights appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) without providing meani… |
| 25-6296 |
Emmanuel Folly v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-12-05 |
Pending |
IFP |
arbitration-findings civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances pro-se-litigant |
Whether systemic barriers preventing a pro se litigant from securing counsel constitute 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying equitable tolling of … |
| 25-647 |
Kevin Frymier v. Dianne Curvey, Individually, and as Judge, 280th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-12-04 |
Pending |
|
eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young first-amendment judicial-immunity pro-se-litigant sovereign-immunity |
Whether a federal appellate court may deem constitutional arguments waived when a pro se appellant raised the substance of those arguments but did not… |
| 25-6256 |
Francis T. Greiser, Jr. v. Marian K. Greiser, et al. |
Florida |
2025-11-26 |
Pending |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction pro-se-litigant supremacy-clause |
Does a Florida court's failure to apply 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) tolling to dismissed claims, and the excessive use of per curiam affirmances, constitute a… |
| 25-6209 |
Rick Negrette v. Phu V. Pham, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-11-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
11-usc-110 bankruptcy-court fine-imposition judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant public-assistance |
Whether the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in imposing a $12,000 fine on a pro se litigant receiving public assistance without considering the… |
| 25A604 |
Joseph Heid v. Mark Rutkoski, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-11-21 |
Application |
|
financial-hardship indigency petition-for-certiorari pro-se-litigant supreme-court time-extension |
Whether an indigent prisoner seeking Supreme Court review may be granted an extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari based on finan… |
| 25-572 |
James Stuart Faller, II v. Department of Justice, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-11-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
absolute-immunity due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant qualified-immunity |
Whether persistent and categorical judicial bias toward pro se litigants violates due process and equal protection guarantees; and whether absolute an… |
| 25-6074 |
Olayiwola Adebisi v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas |
Texas |
2025-11-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
child-support-enforcement due-process fourteenth-amendment jurisdictional-access pro-se-litigant service-of-process |
Whether the Texas courts violated clearly established federal precedent protecting jurisdictional access and due process rights of pro se litigants wh… |
| 25-6056 |
Ruben Santoyo v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-11-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction pro-se-litigant sanctions |
Whether a district court may impose punitive monetary sanctions sua sponte after a notice of appeal has divested it of jurisdiction, in light of confl… |
| 25-553 |
Sossamma George Sebastin v. Sebastin Francis |
Illinois |
2025-11-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights custody-evaluation due-process equal-protection pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness |
Whether fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution are violated when a court denies a pro se litigant access to a sealed custody evaluator's re… |
| 25A511 |
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr. v. Marcus Bach Armas, Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami Dade County, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-11-04 |
Application |
|
case-volume civil-rights eleventh-circuit judicial-review petition-dismissal pro-se-litigant |
Whether a federal court of appeals systematically and improperly dismisses a litigant's civil rights or constitutional claims without substantive revi… |
| 25-5966 |
Mally Gage v. Mayo Clinic, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-10-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights-act due-process motion-to-dismiss pro-se-litigant religious-accommodation title-vii |
Whether employers can demand statements of apostasy and restrict religious communication under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and whether p… |
| 25A479 |
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr. v. Florida |
Florida |
2025-10-27 |
Application |
|
appellate-procedure eleventh-circuit extension-of-time petition-for-certiorari pro-se-litigant supreme-court |
Whether the Supreme Court should grant an extension of time to file a petition for certiorari given multiple pending cases and no opposition from resp… |
| 25-389 |
Abolfazl Hosseinzadeh v. Swedish Health Services, et al. |
Washington |
2025-10-02 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process expert-affidavit fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant summary-judgment |
Whether a state court's application of summary judgment standards violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by excluding qualified expert… |
| 25-5774 |
Jason Adam Jensen v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-10-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis mental-illness pro-se-litigant |
Does the in forma pauperis dismissal process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii) deprive pro se litigants with mental illness of due process and proc… |
| 25A363 |
Teresa Maria Harmon v. Louis I. Waterman, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-09-29 |
Presumed Complete |
|
americans-with-disabilities-act attorney-conduct disability-discrimination legal-advocacy pro-se-litigant reasonable-accommodation |
Whether an attorney's advocacy in opposing disability accommodations can constitute discrimination or retaliation under the Americans with Disabilitie… |
| 25A315 |
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-09-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-procedure due-process fifth-amendment motion-to-strike pro-se-litigant summary-judgment |
Whether a federal district court violates a party's due process rights by striking a summary judgment opposition without providing an opportunity to r… |
| 25A318 |
William Loggins, Jr. v. Kansas |
Kansas |
2025-09-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts in-forma-pauperis law-library-access legal-communication prison-mail-policy pro-se-litigant |
Whether prison mail policies and limited law library access unconstitutionally impede an indigent prisoner's ability to timely file a petition for wri… |
| 25-5558 |
Matthew Andrew Garces v. Cindy Hernandez, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-09-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
claim-preclusion default-judgment due-process fifth-circuit jurisdictional-limit pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in holding that a default judgment against a pro se litigant constitutes a 'full and fair opportunity to litigate' for… |
| 25-5244 |
Kristy Richard v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process evidence-standard judicial-procedure legal-representation pro-se-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 25-104 |
Joe Louis Adams, Jr. v. 3D Systems, Inc. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-07-29 |
Denied |
|
arbitration-clause civil-rights double-jeopardy electronic-filing jurisdiction pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Federal District Court improperly denied Pro Se litigant's ECF notification privileges and jurisdiction to enforce trade agreement past ar… |
| 25-5206 |
Ngozika J. Nwaneri v. George Washington University Hospital |
District of Columbia |
2025-07-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
breach-of-contract due-process eeoc-rights equitable-tolling pro-se-litigant statute-of-limitations |
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing Petitioner's claims as untimely and denying equitable tolling despite ongoing internal adjudication a… |
| 25A98 |
Kenneth J. O'Brien v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-07-23 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-challenge federal-procedure habeas-corpus mandamus pro-se-litigant statutory-certification |
Question not identified. |
| 25-5074 |
Michael Horton v. Captain Gilchrist, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-07-10 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
discovery-rights federal-rules prisoner-litigation pro-se-litigant section-1983 summary-judgment |
May federal courts implement an uncodified special report procedure that divests pro se prisoner litigants of discovery rights afforded them under the… |
| 25-5016 |
General Parker v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-07-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-justice civil-rights due-process pro-se-litigant rooker-feldman-doctrine statute-of-limitations |
Whether the 7th Circuit's dismissal of a pro se litigant's civil rights complaint constitutes a denial of access to courts and violates due process |
| 24-7464 |
Shukeitha Jackson v. AbbVie, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appointed-counsel civil-rights due-process mental-illness pro-se-litigant title-vii |
Whether a pro se litigant with documented severe mental illness is entitled to appointed counsel in a civil rights employment matter under Title VII w… |
| 24-1285 |
Dongxiao Yue v. Wenbin Yang |
California |
2025-06-17 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias pro-se-litigant |
Whether a trial judge's prejudgment, bias, and usurpation of the adversarial role in a civil trial constitutes a violation of due process and equal pr… |
| 24-7129 |
Frank John Richard v. O'Bell T. Winn, Warden, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-05-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure confrontation-clause equal-protection fourteenth-amendment initial-disclosure pro-se-litigant |
Does Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(1)(B)(iv) deny Initial Disclosure to incarcerated, pro se litigants, thereby rendering the Confrontation and Equal Pro… |
| 24-1123 |
Rahim Caldwell v. City of Providence, Rhode Island, et al. |
First Circuit |
2025-04-30 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-rights court-procedure due-process emergency-certification judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant |
When the litigants are prose, should inferior courts be required to specify deficiencies to be corrected when a prose litigant is subjected to emergen… |
| 24-7077 |
Todd Stephens v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-04-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fifth-amendment pro-se-litigant restitution |
Does imposing a restitution order of $130,220,803.65 derived from speculative calculations and disproportionately exceeding the petitioner's limited n… |
| 24-6911 |
William Hall v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2025-04-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-rule-amendment jury-inaccuracies legal-remedy michigan-supreme-court pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process |
Whether the Michigan Supreme Court's failure to apply the May 1, 2021 amendment to MCR 6.502(D) and the Castro v. United States holding constitutes a … |
| 24-6874 |
In Re Robert D. Batson |
|
2025-03-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit mandamus pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has created local rules that arbitrarily encroach upon pro se litigants' rights and violate constitution… |
| 24-6829 |
Timothy Dasler v. Jennifer Knapp, fka Dasler |
Vermont |
2025-03-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process evidentiary-standards judicial-review pro-se-litigant procedural-safeguards retroactive-restrictions |
Does a state violate the Due Process Clause when retroactively imposing litigation restrictions on a pro se litigant without specific findings, height… |
| 24-6751 |
Victoria Lunn Jones v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
court-jurisdiction eeoc-guidelines judicial-procedure pro-se-litigant service-of-process summary-judgment |
Was the Respondent's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed on September 13, 2023, but the proces… |
| 24-6710 |
Robert Klein v. Brookhaven Health Care Facility, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-03-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection jury-trial pro-se-litigant seventh-amendment |
Whether the Seventh Amendment guarantees a pro se litigant's right to a jury trial in civil cases under federal law despite lower court rulings |
| 24-6527 |
Hazhar A. Sayed v. Gilbert Caley, Warden, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2025-02-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
competency-hearing criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance pro-se-litigant self-defense |
Whether the trial court violated Mr. Saved's procedural and substantive due process rights by failing to hold a competency hearing and allowing him to… |
| 24-6493 |
Washington Windsor v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-02-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts due-process fifth-amendment judicial-delay mootness-doctrine pro-se-litigant |
Whether a lower court's unexplained and unjustified delay in docketing a pro se litigant's motion violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause an… |
| 24A761 |
Chad Cutler v. Anthony Wills, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-02-05 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-remedies civil-rights exhaustion-requirement prison-conditions prison-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act's exhaustion requirement bars a pro se prisoner's civil rights claim when administrative remedies were allege… |
| 24-822 |
Alejandro Alers, Jr. v. Olympia Medical Center, et al. |
California |
2025-02-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure equal-protection power-of-attorney pro-se-litigant probate-code wrongful-death |
Are pro se litigants entitled to equal protection, commence wrongful death lawsuits, and represent themselves without counsel under California law? |
| 24-6278 |
In Re Sherly Cadet |
|
2025-01-13 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights contract-enforcement fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant racial-discrimination section-1981 |
Whether the Second Circuit erred in dismissing a pro se litigant's appeal challenging the interpretation of 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the right to be heard |
| 24-6005 |
Aaron Abadi v. Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-11-20 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
concrete-injury constitutional-injury government-policy judicial-review pro-se-litigant standing |
Does a plaintiff have standing when they allege personal, concrete injuries stemming from government policies, even when such policies cause widely sh… |
| 24A413 |
Edvin Santiagomazariegos v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-10-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
court-access institutional-constraints law-library-access legal-research prisoner-rights pro-se-litigant |
Whether a prisoner's limited law library access and restricted legal research time due to institutional constraints constitutes a substantial burden o… |
| 24-5808 |
Cyrus Hazari v. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-10-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
ada-accommodation disability-discrimination federal-preemption judicial-standard legal-remedy pro-se-litigant |
Whether a federal judge can set a uniform national standard for ADA accommodation and preempt state court rules, and whether California courts systema… |
| 24-357 |
Wei Qiu v. Scott County Board of Education |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-10-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights-act discrimination due-process pro-se-litigant rule-59e summary-judgment |
Whether a federal court violated a pro se litigant's due process rights by denying her Rule 59(e) motion and sanction motion without proper justificat… |
| 24A291 |
Charles Garo Avetian v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2024-09-24 |
Presumed Complete |
|
circuit-split electronic-filing federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure jurisdictional-deadline notice-of-appeal pro-se-litigant |
Whether a notice of appeal filed outside the 60-day deadline due to an electronic filing system malfunction should be deemed timely under federal appe… |
| 24A249 |
Igor Lukashin v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-09-10 |
Presumed Complete |
|
due-process filing-ban judicial-discretion ninth-circuit pre-filing-review pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Ninth Circuit violated due process by imposing a pre-filing review order without notice or opportunity to be heard, effectively creating a… |
| 24-5367 |
Khadijah A. Muhammad Kebe v. Washington Township School District, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-08-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights equal-protection fourteenth-amendment legal-aid pro-se-litigant systemic-disadvantage |
Whether the lack of legal aid for pro se litigants in civil cases violates equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment |
| 24-5262 |
Stephen Tripodi v. David Fero, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
discrimination due-process expert-witness medical-malpractice pro-se-litigant veterans-affairs |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's affirmation of summary judgment against a pro se litigant for failing to produce expert witnesses, when such witnesses are… |
| 24A114 |
Edward Greeman v. Edward Burnett, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
2024-07-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts constitutional-rights ineffective-assistance law-library post-conviction pro-se-litigant |
Whether a state prisoner's inability to access a law library constitutes a violation of his constitutional right to meaningful post-conviction review |
| 24A30 |
Martin Akerman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-07-11 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts constitutional-rights due-process filing-fees in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigant |
Whether the denial of in forma pauperis status and appellate filing fees violates a pro se litigant's constitutional right to meaningful access to the… |
| 24A20 |
H.C. v. A.N. |
California |
2024-07-09 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-jurisdiction equitable-tolling filing-extension medical-disability pro-se-litigant procedural-deadline |
Whether a pro se litigant's medical disability and physical limitations can constitute good cause for equitable tolling of procedural filing deadlines… |
| 23A1157 |
Alicia Marie Richards v. Richard A. Marshack, Chapter 7 Trustee, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-06-25 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts constitutional-rights petition-for-certiorari pro-se-litigant procedural-barriers supreme-court |
Whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments protect a pro se litigant's right to meaningful access to the Supreme Court and timely filing of a petitio… |
| 23-7474 |
Bogdan Nicolescu v. Dave Bobby, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-05-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review court-of-appeals due-process judicial-discretion judicial-explanation merits-panel pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness uncandid-briefing |
Is a 3-judge merits panel of a U.S. court of appeals at liberty, perhaps over-reliant on the opposing party's counseled but uncandid briefing, to not … |
| 23-7389 |
Brad Evans v. Florida |
Florida |
2024-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants |
Whether the State of Florida has created rules of criminal and appellate procedure that arbitrarily and unreasonably encroach upon the personal rights… |
| 23-7378 |
Frederick Herrod v. Members of the 79th Congress |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-05-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adjudication appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus liberal-construction motion necessary-and-proper-clause pro-se pro-se-litigant speech-and-debate-clause |
if-the-congressional-command-of-federal-rule-of-appellate-procedure-24(a)(5)-requires-certain-submissions-must-be-included-with-a-motion,-is-a-pro-se-… |
| 23-1120 |
DaBeth Manns v. U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Banc of America Funding Corporation for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2007-03 |
District of Columbia |
2024-04-16 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure-claim foreclosure-debt-claim pro-se-litigant stare-decisis |
Should the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision be upheld in part or whole, reversed and/or the case remanded? |
| 23-1104 |
In Re Robert M. Miller |
|
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion bias-prejudice civil-procedure court-discretion federal-defendant judicial-bias judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation writ-of-mandamus |
Whether this Court should issue a writ of mandamus to reassign cases due to judge's bias |
| 23A894 |
Terrance Brown v. Andrew Beshear, Governor of Kentucky |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-04-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure federal-rules jurisdictional-prerequisite notice-of-appeal pro-se-litigant time-limitation |
Whether a pro se litigant's notice of appeal filed outside the standard 30-day window can be considered timely under federal appellate procedural rule… |
| 23-7137 |
Diana Ingrid Reismann Sexton v. Gilbert Sexton |
Texas |
2024-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment child-custody constitutional-rights due-process hague-convention judicial-recusal jus-cogens mistake-of-law pro-se-litigant recusal |
Can a state district judge be removed from a child-custody case for violation-of-due-process-clause, 14th-amendment, when the judge omits exception-28… |
| 23-955 |
Robert M. Miller v. Martin J. Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2024-03-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5-usc-7703 civil-service equitable-powers interim-relief mixed-case preliminary-injunction pro-se-litigant whistleblower |
Does the district court review a motion for interim relief under the standards for a preliminary injunction, under 5U.S.C. § 7703(c), or under the cou… |
| 23A746 |
Carlos Jackson v. Markel American Insurance Company, et al. |
Nevada |
2024-02-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-rights complaint-amendment due-process judicial-discretion medical-emergency pro-se-litigant |
Whether a pro se litigant's constitutional due process rights are violated when a district court judge denies an opportunity to amend a complaint and … |
| 23A748 |
Carlos Jackson v. Dickinson Wright PLLC, et al. |
Nevada |
2024-02-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
attorney-error certiorari extension-of-time legal-deadline pro-se-litigant supreme-court |
Whether equitable tolling of the certiorari deadline is appropriate when an attorney provides incorrect deadline information to a pro se litigant |
| 23-843 |
Robert Michael Miller v. Martin J. Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-02-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
agency-personnel-actions civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts judicial-bias merit-systems-protection-board political-discrimination pro-se pro-se-litigant standing whistleblower-reprisal |
Whether the district court's errors and abuses demonstrate antagonism toward a pro se litigant and favoritism toward a federal defendant |
| 23-6654 |
Lancey Darnell Ray v. Terry Quisenberry, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-02-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights comanche-tribe due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-recognition legal-liability pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation treaty-interpretation treaty-rights tribal-sovereignty |
Whether an enrolled member of the Comanche Tribe is liable for wrongs under a treaty |
| 23-6608 |
Mary M. Mooney v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-01-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 1st-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-discretion due-process filing-procedure pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-59e-motion |
Whether the trial court erred in denying petitioner's timely-filed Rule-59e-motion |
| 23A698 |
Martha Carrascal v. American Airlines, Inc. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-01-29 |
Presumed Complete |
|
discovery-sanctions dismissal employment-discrimination judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant rule-37 |
Whether a district court may impose the sanction of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(v) for a plaintiff's failure to comply… |
| 23-6543 |
Odeiu Joy Powers v. Department of Homeland Security, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-01-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-service due-process federal-civil-service judicial-discretion preference-eligible pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness sua-sponte-dismissal unilateral-ban veteran |
Must rulings reflect material facts on the record? |
| 23-801 |
Richard George, et al. v. Triton Property Investments, LLC |
California |
2024-01-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights contract-clause due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants seventh-amendment state-courts |
Whether the empirical evidence of bias against, otherwise identically situated, pro se litigants in state courts proves the judicial intent to discrim… |
| 23-6450 |
Alfred Correa Dizon v. Vectrus Systems Corporation |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-01-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (5)IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence evidence-exclusion fair-trial judicial-bias pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the lower court and defense counsel violated federal rules of civil procedure, due process, and the appellant's constitutional rights |
| 23A625 |
Shaheryar Khan v. Kent Seton, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure court-dismissal frivolous-appeal in-forma-pauperis ninth-circuit pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petitioner's appeal as frivolous and denying in forma pauperis status |
| 23A594 |
Joseph Randolph Mays v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-12-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-review district-court federal-tort-claims-act motion-to-dismiss pro-se-litigant procedural-default |
Whether a pro se litigant's Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the United States can be dismissed with prejudice when the plaintiff fails to time… |
| 23A549 |
Omero Nino-Guerrero v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-12-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-access-to-courts court-appointed-counsel federal-prisoner language-barrier petition-for-certiorari pro-se-litigant |
Whether a federal prisoner who does not speak English is entitled to court-appointed counsel to assist in preparing a petition for certiorari |
| 23-6254 |
William Graves, III v. Florida |
Florida |
2023-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants |
Whether the state of Florida has created rules of criminal and appellate procedure that arbitrarily and unreasonably encroaches upon the personal righ… |
| 23A522 |
Gary Wayne Warner v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-12-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-rights fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance pro-se-litigant sixth-amendment |
Whether Texas's systemic failure to provide an adequate procedural vehicle for raising ineffective assistance of counsel claims violates a criminal de… |
| 23-6163 |
Vidala Aaronoff v. Curtis Olson |
California |
2023-12-05 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
attorney-fees civil-harassment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection indigent pro-se pro-se-litigant |
Whether the Due Process Clause requires a court to construe a pro se litigant's filings liberally in order to enable the litigant to participate as fu… |
| 23-6126 |
Wayne M. English v. Parcel Express, Inc. |
Texas |
2023-11-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-misconduct legal-representation pro-se pro-se-litigant texas-constitution |
Can the State of Texas through its judiciary ignore the state's own legislative intent, the Texas Bill of Rights, the Federal Constitution and the due… |
| 23A387 |
Towaki Komatsu v. United States, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-10-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
deadline-extension financial-hardship litigation-burden pro-se-litigant supreme-court-procedure writ-of-certiorari |
Whether a pro se litigant experiencing financial hardship and ongoing litigation can be granted an extension of time to file a petition for writ of ce… |
| 23-5855 |
Regina Tate v. Hamilton County Election Commission |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-10-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights dismissal due-process judicial-procedure legal-counsel pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the Dismissal should be reconsidered for failure to appoint legal counsel |
| 23-5805 |
Jeffrey Corporal v. Ronald Weber, Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-10-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction filing-deadline harmless-error pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing statute-of-limitations |
Does a federal district court harmlessly err when it erroneously extends a defendant's inexcusably neglectfully missed filing deadline to respond to a… |
| 23-231 |
Linda A. Porter v. Kennard Law PC, dba Kennard Richard PC, et al. |
Texas |
2023-09-12 |
Denied |
|
appeal appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the appellate court violated Porter's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Rights |
| 23-5545 |
Robert K. Decker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-09-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts administrative-procedure-act amended-complaint amendment civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction pleadings pro-se-litigant |
Did the lower courts err in dismissing the case and denying the petitioner's motion to amend the complaint |
| 23-5492 |
Dennis Christensen v. Barry Reddish, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-08-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights due-process handwritten-petition illegible-document potential-legal-issue prison-law-library pro-se-litigant standing unclear-text unreadable-text |
Whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the case without providing the petitioner an opportunity to amend the complaint to show… |
| 23-5406 |
Kecia Porter v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-08-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-rights color-of-law cooperation-clause due-process equal-protection prejudice pro-se-litigant summary-judgment under-color-of-law |
Whether the 7th Circuit's decision is an error, contrary to well-settled law, finding respondent was 'substantially prejudiced' by petitioner's action… |
| 23-142 |
Joe L. Adams v. Royal Park Nursing and Rehabilitation |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-08-16 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction medical-negligence nursing-home-abuse nursing-home-reform-act pressure-ulcers pro-se-litigant standing |
Did the court of Appeal Err in Affirming the District Court Decision regarding Jurisdiction over Nursing-Home-Abuse-Cases |
| 23-5284 |
John Wesley Lee, Jr. v. Maryland |
Maryland |
2023-08-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery discovery-violation dna-evidence dna-testing due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigant video-recording |
Whether an Indigent Pro Se Petitioner is Entitled to counsel |
| 22-7891 |
Ronald James Littlefield v. California |
California |
2023-06-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment fundamental-fairness judicial-notice pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process state-court |
Can a state tribunal deprive litigants to that tribunal equal protection of the law and even handed justice based upon a commitment offense? |
| 22-7668 |
Niki Hamidi v. Ike M. Iqbal, et al. |
California |
2023-05-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 1st-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights discovery-sanctions due-process pro-se pro-se-litigant trial-court |
Whether the 1st and 14th Amendment impose a duty on the trial court to inform and provide certain warnings and opportunities to pro se litigants prior… |
| 22-7456 |
Zhaojin David Ke v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-05-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-justice equal-protection evidence-presentation judicial-discrimination pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the right to present evidence in an appeals court is Constitutionally protected |
| 22-7294 |
Robert L. Tatum v. Earnell Lucas, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-04-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants sanctions summary-judgment |
Whether the systemic discrimination against pro se litigants by the federal courts, including the imposition of punitive sanctions for filing non-friv… |
| 22-7246 |
Mikequale Miller v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc., et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-04-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-protection due-process gideon-v-wainwright pro-se-litigant products-liability standing strict-liability |
Should a Pro Se Litigant in a products-liability case be given the same or similar Constitutional protection and liberties as Pro Se criminal defendan… |
| 22-7176 |
In Re Thomas J. M. Goodin |
|
2023-04-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court-review civil-rights due-process exceptional-circumstances federal-habeas habeas-corpus mandamus-petition pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether granting of this writ will conform to the Court's appellate jurisdiction that only exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court… |
| 22-7093 |
Walter Harris v. Neil Turner, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-03-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights culer-v-adams due-process interstate-agreement-on-detainers prison-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness section-1983 standing |
Whether the petitioner's 42 USC 1983 complaint was improperly dismissed for failing to cite specific statutes and case law on the PLRA complaint form,… |
| 22-6937 |
Robert L. Davis v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-03-06 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 28-usc-1915 access-to-courts civil-rights court-access cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment first-amendment pro-se-litigant redress |
Does a lifetime ban to courts under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) unless one pays in full deny due process violating the 14th amendment right to seek redress? |
| 22-6785 |
Ian Gage v. Midwestern University |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-system medical-privacy pro-se-litigant standing throop-v-fe-young-co |
Do litigants under the Americans with Disability Act lose federal protections to medical privacy through a new interpretation of the 1963 Throop v. F.… |
| 22-6506 |
Andrew Simpson v. Carl Davis, dba Davis Construction Co., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-01-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-1915 civil-rights court-appointed-counsel due-process exceptional-circumstances informa-pauperis legal-representation mental-illness pro-se-litigant |
When acting under 28 USC 1915 Informa paupers, do a mental illness qualify as a 'exceptional circumstance' for appointment of council? Do a mentally i… |
| 22-621 |
Linda Matarese, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hilda Duld Bauman, Deceased v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, dba Virginia Hospital Center, et al. |
Virginia |
2023-01-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment haines-v-kerner motion-to-strike pro-se-litigant reasonable-accommodation |
Did the Supreme Court of Virginia violate Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights? |
| 22-6375 |
Homayoun Maali v. William K. Harrington, United States Trustee |
First Circuit |
2022-12-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-court civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process nationality pro-se pro-se-litigant religion |
Whether the circuit court of appeal erred in allowing the respondent to violate the petitioner's constitutional rights due to discrimination based on … |
| 22-548 |
Randall E. Rollins v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-jurisdiction justice-courts pro-se pro-se-litigant sovereign-immunity |
Did the court below err in not considering the issue that pro se litigants in Texas justice courts are treated unequally from all litigants in non-jus… |
| 22-6249 |
Ruben James Rios v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure jurisdiction motion-to-reopen notice-of-appeal pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-deficiency |
Whether a pro se litigant's 'Notice of Appeal' constitutes a liberally-construed 'Motion to Reopen Time to File' as well as a 'Notice of Appeal |
| 22-6035 |
Michael Andra Reed, aka Mychal Andra Reed v. California |
California |
2022-11-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-challenge criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection indigent-litigants indigent-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant time-bar time-limits |
Does the state of California criminal appeal time limit (time bar) violate the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment equal protection clause pertaining t… |
| 22-6030 |
In Re Jason Paul Maple |
|
2022-11-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-trial-error due-process free-speech jurisdictional-power manifest-disregard pro-se-litigant standing third-circuit-court |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit acted in excess of its jurisdictional power |
| 22-428 |
Deborah Walton v. First Merchants Bank |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-11-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
billing-errors dispute-letters due-process fair-credit-billing-act first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process statute-of-limitations |
Whether a Creditor must follow the requirements specified in 1974 by the Fair Credit Billing Act |
| 22-5830 |
William Richter v. Ghaliah Obaisi, as Executor of the Estate of Saleh Obaisi |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-10-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct legal-assistance pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process procedural-errors |
Whether the Faivie Te Apnot Cowimwrel Oy Apneal Foa Rosie, OF the Disthirel Cords Alaue of Dis hes Ze Faleng To Recess wee Conmtel Upow Wilheincsal of… |
| 22-290 |
Anne-Marie Mendible v. Special Proceedings Department of the Wake County Court, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-09-27 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction fourteenth-amendment pro-se pro-se-litigant res-judicata standing subject-matter-jurisdiction truth-in-lending-act |
Whether the due process constitutional right of the petitioner is infringed and the Federal Court has jurisdiction to entertain it |
| 22-5444 |
Robert JW McCleland v. Rick Raemisch, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
expert-witness indigent-litigants judicial-notice medical-evidence medical-information pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-201 rule-706 undue-burden |
Does requiring an expert witness to present medical information create an undue burden on the courts and unfairly prejudice pro se, indigent litigants… |
| 22-5398 |
In Re Douglas Cornell Jackson |
|
2022-08-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-sanctions habeas-corpus pro-se-litigant standing state-corrective-process state-court-appeals |
Whether a federal court can constitutionally impose sanctions upon a pro se petitioner when such a petitioner is without an available state corrective… |
| 22-67 |
Robert "Bob" King v. Specialty Hospital of Washington, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2022-07-26 |
Denied |
|
anti-SLAPP civil-procedure civil-rights due-process expedited-hearing free-speech fundamental-rights pro-se-litigant procedural-rights special-motion-to-dismiss standing |
Whether the mandatory expedited hearing on a special motion to dismiss under an anti-SLAPP law is necessary to prevent a deprivation of fundamental pr… |
| 21-8235 |
Joshua Dicks v. Natasha Davis |
Arkansas |
2022-06-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
attorney-diligence civil-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment indigent-litigants parental-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant waiver-of-appeal |
Whether the Arkansas Court's application of 'attorney diligence' waiver of right to appeal rules to pro se litigants in private termination of parenta… |
| 21-7801 |
Richard E. Shreves v. United States District Court for the District of Montana |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-authority document-access due-process e-filing e-filing-program inmate-rights prison-litigation pro-se-litigant standing statutory-interpretation |
Did the District Court exceed its authority in determining pro-se inmate litigants were not entitled to one free copy of filed documents under 28 U.S.… |
| 21-7805 |
William Paul Burch v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment free-speech frivolous-dismissal in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigant removal sanctions |
What is the complete legal definition of frivolous? |
| 21-1391 |
Robert Kelly, Jr. v. City of Mount Vernon, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2022-04-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights court-ruling due-process judicial-duty legal-information oral-decision oral-rulings pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-rights standing |
To what extent do courts have an affirmative duty to fully inform pro se litigants of courtroom decisions and rulings issued orally from the court, an… |
| 21-7741 |
David Mejia v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Has the Fifth Circuit erred in holding fraud on the court not a substantive constitutional violation of due process? |
| 21-7694 |
Jason Paul Maple v. Lonnie Oliver, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion |
Third Circuit |
2022-04-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review constitutional-error constitutional-trial-error due-process harmless-error pro-se-litigant standard-of-review supreme-court-standard third-circuit trial-procedure |
Whether the Third Circuit Appellate Court adhered to the terms of harmless-error review, judged by the standard set-forth by the United States Supreme… |
| 21-7383 |
Francis B. Armah v. Janet Dowling, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-03-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
abrogation access-to-courts appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant supreme-court-precedent tenth-circuit |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) witho… |
| 21-7336 |
Karsten O. Allen v. J. Mayo, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-03-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process good-time-credits liberty-interest prison-conditions prisoner-litigation pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-defect state-created-rights virginia-department-of-corrections |
Does the language of Virginia's statutes and Department of Corrections' Operating Procedures establish a state-created liberty interest in good time e… |
| 21-7308 |
Deon D. Colvin v. Howard University |
District of Columbia |
2022-03-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment issue-preclusion pleadings pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process standing |
Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals violated the petitioner's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process by failing to consider all of the pet… |
| 21-1211 |
Constance George v. House of Hope Recovery, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-04 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure federal-rule-of-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure jurisdiction notice-of-appeal pro-se pro-se-litigant service-of-process service-requirement standing |
Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 permits a court of appeals to dismiss an appeal because the appellant did not serve the notice of appeal |
| 21-6977 |
Lavont Flanders, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-01-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-1591 constitutional-challenge constitutional-claims equitable-tolling habeas-corpus habeas-petition postal-service-interference pro-se-litigant sex-trafficking sua-sponte-dismissal |
Question not identified |
| 21-6765 |
Hitoshi Ombe v. George Cook, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-01-06 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-liberty due-process equitable-tolling fifth-amendment mental-disability pro-se pro-se-litigant |
How the Court should respond to pro se litigant with mild mental disability, e.g., highly functional autism disability (i.e., least severe autism spec… |
| 21-967 |
Pius Barikpoa Nwinee v. St. Louis Developmental Disability Treatment Centers, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-01-06 |
Denied |
|
administrative-process civil-rights discrimination-claim due-process eeoc equitable-tolling pro-se pro-se-litigant right-to-sue-letter title-vii |
Should the doctrine of equitable tolling be expanded to include a pro se litigant's mistaken belief about EEOC filing requirements? |
| 21-6508 |
Daniel Jones v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-12-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure appointment-of-counsel circuit-court-jurisdiction circuit-court-split civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion motion-for-counsel pro-se-litigant standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal pursuant to 25 U.S.C.§ 1915(e) based solely on the denial of the motion for… |
| 21-815 |
Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Bruce S. Rogow, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-12-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-appellate-procedure federal-courts jurisdictional-limits notice-of-appeal pro-se-litigant rules-of-civil-procedure service-of-documents standing |
Has a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the relevance of the resetting of the end date for the filing of the Notice of Appeal under FRAP … |
| 21-628 |
Ebenezer K. Howe, IV v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-11-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
access-to-courts civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process irs judicial-impartiality judicial-independence judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigant recusal |
Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigan… |
| 21-5865 |
Glen Plourde v. Maine, et al. |
First Circuit |
2021-10-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction judicial-abuse pro-se pro-se-litigant standing torture |
Does the continual disenfranchisement of the Petitioner by The Federal Courts' violate the Petitioner's Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights to Subst… |
| 21-5716 |
Pecola Cousar v. New York-Presbyterian Queens |
Second Circuit |
2021-09-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights discovery district-court-discretion due-process pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing summary-judgment title-vii |
Whether the district court erred and/or abused its discretion |
| 21-5497 |
José Yeyille v. Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al. |
Florida |
2021-08-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts constitutional-review due-process equal-protection first-amendment first-amendment-petition-clause fourteenth-amendment indigent-rights petition-clause pro-se-litigant |
Whether Florida Constitution Article V, Sections 3(b)(3), 3(b)(7), and 3(b)(8), Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (1980), and Grate v. State, 750 So. … |
| 21-5465 |
Kent Glen Williams v. Alan Stewart, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-claim due-process equal-protection free-speech petition pro-se-litigant procedural-requirements section-1983 standing |
Whether Rule 3.2 of the Idaho Department of Correction violates the First, Fourteenth, and Petition Clauses of the U.S. Constitution |
| 21-45 |
Peter C. Benedith v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attempted-murder civil-rights due-process electronic-harassment free-speech legal-system-integrity pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation right-to-life |
Question presented to the court |
| 21-5018 |
In Re Zoe Ajjahnon |
|
2021-07-06 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure default-judgment due-process false-claims-act federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure pro-se-litigant summary-judgment third-circuit-court |
Whether the False Claims Act statutes preclude established standards of Federal Rules for Civil Procedure Rule 56 in a default/summary judgment conclu… |
| 20-8178 |
Heena Shim-Larkin v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
2021-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-455 due-process equal-protection fair-trial good-faith-standard judicial-bias judicial-recusal mandamus-appeal objective-standard pro-se-litigant recusal |
Whether a judge must be disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 455 if the judge makes rulings more restrictive against one party than the other in comparable … |
| 20-8050 |
Jennifer Van Bergen, aka Gwendolyn Stone v. Scott Koppel |
Florida |
2021-05-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection indigent medical-malpractice pro-se pro-se-litigant separation-of-powers |
Does the Florida Medical Malpractice Act's presuit medical expert affidavit requirement violate the 14th Amendment equal protection clause and the 5th… |
| 20-1544 |
Felicia Ross v. Peregrine Health Services, Inc., et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-05-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel counsel-request district-court-dismissal due-process equal-protection pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process standing |
Did the District Courts err by not allowing Due Process? |
| 20-7925 |
In Re Clement Mosseri |
|
2021-05-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-access discrimination due-process equal-protection fair-hearing judicial-bias legal-representation pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation right-to-counsel unbiased-tribunal |
Is petitioner entitled to a fair hearing before an unbiased tribunal? |
| 20-7888 |
James Arthur Ross v. Steven Shelton, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-04-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion medical-treatment pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness standing summary-judgment |
Did the District Court abuse its discretion in refusing to appoint counsel? |
| 20-7860 |
Alicia Marie Richards v. Ryal W. Richards |
California |
2021-04-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection family-law pro-se-litigant property-rights sanctions statutory-interpretation |
Is the statutory law taking of a person's property arbitrary, too broad and discriminatory under Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161 (2002) and v… |
| 20-7693 |
Keenan G. Wilkins, aka Nerrah Brown v. C. Joksch, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-04-08 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-1915 appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-appeal pro-se-litigant standing three-strikes |
Is a prisoner who is found to have three strikes pursuant to 28 USC 1915 entitled to a one-time appeal on the merits of this finding? |
| 20-1323 |
Gregory Patmythes v. City of Madison, Wisconsin |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-03-23 |
Denied |
|
appellate-rights civil-procedure clerk court-accessibility due-process electronic-filing federal-rules judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant procedural-failure standing |
Whether a pro se litigant can be penalized for a CM/ECF failure that renders the clerk's office inaccessible |
| 20-7411 |
Douglas Cornell Jackson v. Leah Berean, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights court-discretion due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-proceedings judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-60b standing |
Should the lower courts have been so stringent in limiting their review to only one exception of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in deciding whether to grant re… |
| 20-1140 |
Angela W. DeBose v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-02-19 |
Denied |
|
appeal appeal-rights civil-procedure consolidation due-process final-judgment pro-se-litigant rule-42-consolidation rules-enabling-act self-representation substantive-right substantive-rights |
Whether a Rule 42 consolidation can deprive a party of a substantive right—the right to an appeal from a final judgment—when the Rules Enabling Act pr… |
| 20-7136 |
James Robert Stanford v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-02-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review miller-el-v-cockrell miller-v-cockrell pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-default |
Does the requisite 'substantial showing' require pro-se-litigants to re-submit supporting-documents |
| 20-1102 |
Michael James Hanna v. Little League Baseball, Inc. |
California |
2021-02-10 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process pro-se-litigant standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether California's vexatious-litigant-statute unconstitutionally-deprives-a-litigant-of-due-process-and-access-to-the-courts |
| 20-7051 |
Tomas Zavalidroga v. United States District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
2021-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech iccpr pro-se-litigant standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) pro… |
| 20-1052 |
In Re Christopher Gary Baylor |
|
2021-02-02 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigant section-1983 section-1983-claim |
Does a non-prisoner, indigent, pro se litigant to a Section 1983 claim who initially proceeds In Forma Pauperis but later pays for his appeal, lose th… |
| 20-6981 |
Phillip Jay Walter, Jr. v. Texas |
Texas |
2021-01-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
6th-amendment appellate-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel meaningful-appeal pro-se-litigant sixth-amendment venue |
Is an Appellate Court duty bound to ensure that an Appellant - whether Represented or Pro Se - is afforded a full, fair, and meaningful appeal |
| 20-6838 |
Jason Sinagwana Nsinano, aka Jason Nsinano v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-detention civil-procedure civil-rights conditional-release due-process habeas-corpus jurisdictional-mootness mootness pleading-standards pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether a lower federal court loses jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition upon release of the civil detention petitioner |
| 20-6542 |
Alfonso Percy Pew v. John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Pennsylvania |
2020-12-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment federal-religious-land-use-institutionalized-perso federal-settlement-agreement first-amendment pro-se-litigant religious-land-use standing |
Whether the Pennsylvania state court judicial system has created a hands-off doctrine for pro se litigant's 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil-rights complaint all… |
| 20-6496 |
Michael Alford v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-12-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-pornography criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing expert-services expert-witness forensic-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-assistance motion-of-innocence pro-se-litigant right-to-counsel |
Whether the court erred in refusing to order legal assistance and forensic software expert assistance to obtain and submit factual evidence |
| 20-6506 |
Andy Buxton v. Iva C. Dougherty, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-12-02 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure discovery due-process pro-se-litigant standing |
Question not identified |
| 20-6413 |
Maxine Shepard v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-11-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure good-cause pro-se-litigant procedural-default service-of-process standing |
Whether the COA improperly held in conflict with other courts that the Petitioner did not show good cause to excuse procedural default and allow for a… |
| 20-699 |
Michael Sammons v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-11-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure frivolous frivolous-litigation mandamus mandamus-review pro-se-litigant sanctions standing voluntary-dismissal |
Whether a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntary dismissal under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) |
| 20-6288 |
Allen Snyder v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-11-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-procedure criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-error legal-review post-conviction-relief pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation victim-identification |
Whether the lower courts erred in denying Snyder's application for post-conviction relief based on an apparent confusion about the identity of the vic… |
| 20-623 |
Amy R. Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-11-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
all-writs-act appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process jurisdictional-dispute patent patent-infringement pro-se-litigant standing takings writ-of-certiorari |
Whether Petitioner is entitled to a Writ of Certiorari under the All Writs Act against the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or against the … |
| 20-624 |
Larry Golden v. Apple Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-11-10 |
Denied |
|
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process intellectual-property patent patent-rights pleading-standards pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process seventh-amendment standing |
Is it a question of law for the District Court and/or the Appeals Court judges to unjustly violate a Pro Se litigant's procedural due process or viola… |
| 20-619 |
R. S., et al., Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, A. S. v. Board of Education Shenendehowa Central School District, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-11-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-procedure autism civil-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion motion-to-reopen pro-se pro-se-litigant standing time-limitations |
Whether an appellate court may sua sponte dismiss an appeal |
| 20-6229 |
Jerry Earl Johnson v. Erin McReynolds |
Nevada |
2020-11-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process mailbox-rule pro-se-litigant statute-of-limitations |
Does the mailbox rule apply to filing of the complaint when a pro se litigant submits the civil complaint to the prison law library to be mailed via U… |
| 20-5736 |
David P. Moran v. Florida |
Florida |
2020-09-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-brief appellate-counsel fla-r-app-p-9-141(d) habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance merits-review pro-se-litigant standing writ-of-review |
Does the United States Supreme Court have the authority to review the underlying merits of an issue when the action being challenged is a petition for… |
| 20-5608 |
Michael Jonathon Besoyan v. Jimmy Yee, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-access jury-trial pro-se-litigant void-orders |
Whether any court or tribunal should be allowed to deny or deprive any citizen of basic rights listed in the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment |
| 20-258 |
Alvin E. Medina v. Federal Aviation Administration |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal appeal-rights arbitration arbitration-decision civil-procedure due-process equitable-tolling judicial-review notice notice-of-appeal pro-se pro-se-litigant |
whether-the-failure-to-provide-notice-of-appeal-rights-with-arbitrator's-decision-and-certificate-of-service-to-pro-se-litigants-warranted-a-favorable… |
| 20-211 |
Barry Rosen v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-08-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
airspace-system civil-procedure due-process injury-in-fact national-airspace-system pro-se-litigant public-use-airport separation-of-powers standing statutory-rights |
Whether a federally certificated Pilot demonstrated injury-in-fact |
| 20-5354 |
Johnnie Lee Jordan, Jr. v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-08-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2254-petition brady-violation certificate-of-appealability civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process giglio-violation habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insufficient-evidence pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether pro se litigants can be sentenced to a natural life sentence because of Giglio-and-Brady-violations |
| 20-147 |
Timothy B. Brown v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-08-13 |
Denied |
|
adversary-process civil-procedure district-court due-process magistrate magistrate-referral pro-se-litigant res-judicata sua-sponte |
Does the Supreme Court's ruling in Arizona v. California empower a District Judge to raise the issue of res judicata sua sponte? |
| 20-5061 |
Philip Emiabata v. BB&T, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-07-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure notice pleadings pro-se-litigant rule-12d summary-judgment |
Whether the district court is required under Rule 12(d) to exclude matters outside the pleadings or give notice of conversion to summary judgment |
| 19-1419 |
Michael A. Henry-Bey v. Hector Castro, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeals appellate-procedure arbitration civil-procedure court-transfer due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-review pro-se-litigant standing subject-matter-jurisdiction transfer |
Whether the court had federal question jurisdiction to hear the petitioner's appeal, and if not, should the court have transferred the appeal to the c… |
| 19-8768 |
Josh Albritton v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-22 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
assistance-of-counsel constitutional-protections contract-law discovery-rights due-process government-legislation grounds-for-contracting judicial-procedure pro-se-litigant self-incrimination supreme-court |
Question not identified |
| 19-1281 |
Dimitritza Toromanova v. Summit Real Estate Services, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-05-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review civil-procedure claim-preclusion federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure frcp-60(b) frcp-60(d) independent-action judicial-procedure ninth-circuit pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-60(d) |
Did the doctrine of Claim Preclusion preclude a party from asserting the right to file a complaint as an independent action under FRCP 60(d) |
| 19-8291 |
Willis J. Yazzie v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-04-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the court of appeals disregarded this Court's decision in Buck v. Davis to advise a pro-se litigant about the COA procedure by deciding the me… |
| 19-1202 |
Thomas Taffe, et al. v. First National Bank of Alaska |
Alaska |
2020-04-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process jury-trial legal-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants standing summary-judgment systemic-bias |
Did a systemic bias against pro se litigants lead to the unconstitutional denial of Petitioners' right to a jury trial in this case? |
| 19-1122 |
Hong Tang v. University of Baltimore, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-03-13 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights declaratory-injunctive-relief declaratory-relief due-process eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young jurisdictional-grounds official-capacity pro-se-litigant service-of-process sovereign-immunity standing |
Whether the lower courts should have liberally construed the pro se litigant's claims |
| 19-7975 |
Glenn Myer v. All Dulles Area Muslim Society |
Virginia |
2020-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights civil-rights,pro-se,due-process,court-rules,subpoe court-rules due-process judicial-procedure legal-discrimination pro-se pro-se-litigant standing subpoena |
Does Virginia have the right to discriminate against a Pro Se litigant and violate their Civil Rights, US Supreme Court Rulings, Court rules |
| 19-7702 |
Douglas Cornell Jackson v. Leah Berean, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-02-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion access-to-courts civil-rights civil-rights-retaliation court-access due-process equal-protection indigent-rights judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation retaliation retaliation-claims standing |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals and U.S. District Court decisions conflict with the formulation describing retaliation claims within the U.S. Circui… |
| 19-7675 |
Alonzo Lamar Johnson v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2020-02-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus incarcerated incarcerated-petitioner plain-error pro-se pro-se-litigant section-2255-motion standing |
Whether the US Court of Appeals for the Third circuit improperly denied Petitioner's request for a Certificate of Appealability |
| 19-964 |
Christopher Lawrence v. University Hospital, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-02-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights diversity due-process federal-procedure interpleader interpleader-statute minimal-diversity pro-se-litigant standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether the 11th Circuit violated petitioners' rights as beneficiaries to allow and select enjoining siblings as claimants and real parties in a negli… |
| 19-958 |
Bahar Mikhak v. University of Phoenix, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
clear-and-convincing-evidence counsel-negligence dismissal-with-prejudice fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court frcp-60(b)(3) frcp-60b new-trial pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process |
Was the Ninth Circuit's holding wrong for departing from its own precedent and creating a conflict with other circuits over the application of the 'cl… |
| 19-7421 |
Lawyer J. Henderson v. Kevin Franklin, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abandoned-claim bankruptcy bankruptcy-petition chapter-7-trustee civil-rights claim-abandonment disclosure due-process inadvertent-disclosure intent-standard judicial-estoppel presumption-of-deceit pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether a debtor who has inadvertently failed to disclose the existence of a potential claim in a bankruptcy petition should be estopped from litigati… |
| 19-7276 |
Ketut Pujayasa v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules due-process judicial-discretion prejudice prisoner prisoner-litigation prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-4a6 time-limitation timeliness |
Did the district court and appellate court err in concluding that the petitioner's Rule 4(a)(6) motion, which was sent on February 20, 2019, and recei… |
| 19-7281 |
Clifton A. Grant v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. |
District of Columbia |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 1st-amendment access-to-courts due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant right-to-petition |
Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denial of Petitioner's timely and duly filed Appeal, without any lawful judicial reasoning o… |
| 19-833 |
In Re Philippe Buhannic |
|
2020-01-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal bias civil-rights constitutional-rights corruption due-process judicial-bias pro-se-litigant right-to-appeal standing state-appeal-courts |
Whether the state appeal courts have the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant |
| 19-834 |
In Re Philippe Buhannic |
|
2020-01-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process foreign-litigant judicial-bias legal-discrimination pro-se pro-se-litigant state-courts |
Whether the state courts have the right to refuse due process to a foreign pro-se-litigant |
| 19-775 |
In Re Philippe Buhannic |
|
2019-12-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts appeal appeal-rights bias constitution constitutional-rights due-process due-process-clause-of-the-14th-amendment equal-protection federal-court foreign-litigant judicial-bias prejudice pro-se-litigant pro-se-representation |
Whether the Federal court has the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant |
| 19-6694 |
Tim Sundy v. Martha C. Christian, Judge, et al. |
Georgia |
2019-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-court civil-rights constitutional-rights court-officer criminal-activity due-process equal-protection pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants property-rights state-court-officers takings |
Whether pro se litigants are immune from criminal activity by State court officers |
| 19-6452 |
David P. Moran v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure discovery mandamus pro-se pro-se-litigant records standing subpoena subpoena-enforcement trial-court writ-of-court |
Should a writ of mandamus be automatically granted when the defendant has adequately shown an entity violated an earlier subpoena for records? |
| 19-476 |
Usha Jain, et vir v. David Barker, et al. |
Florida |
2019-10-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fraud housing-dispute judicial-discrimination judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigant retaliation sanctions standing state-officer-misconduct |
Can state officers discriminate against pro se litigants? |
| 19-6012 |
Kevin Carroll Anderson v. Arthur B. Greene, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-09-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
breach-of-contract civil-procedure civil-procedure-standards equitable-tolling judicial-procedure motion-to-dismiss pro-se pro-se-litigant second-circuit statute-of-limitations summary-judgment supervisory-power |
Were the Second Circuit's decisions, approving the District Court's application of the summary judgment standard to all of the pro se and uneducated P… |
| 19-5844 |
James Arthur Ross v. John Myrick, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
9th-circuit-ruling civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights district-court-error due-process evidence expert-testimony precedent pro-se-litigant standing summary-judgment |
Did the District Court error in determining that a 9th Circuit Appellate ruling from almost two decades ago in Bahrampour v. Lampert, 356 F.3d 969, 97… |
| 19-5374 |
Benson Coriolant v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-07-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abandoned-claims actual-appeal actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure fifth-circuit pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-rules |
Whether the Fifth Circuit's holding that the pro se litigant has abandoned any claim(s) not raised in an application for a certificate of appealabilit… |
| 19-5364 |
In Re Carl A. Courtright, III |
|
2019-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
Abuse-of-discretion access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights court-access due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines first-amendment judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigant sanctions |
Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals abuse its discretion in ordering a $500 sanction against a pro se indigent petitioner? |
| 19-5329 |
James Lester Williams, Jr. v. Jamai F. Samuels |
Florida |
2019-07-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment access-to-courts appellate-review due-process equal-protection family-law-dispute petition-for-redress pro-se pro-se-litigant right-to-petition |
Whether Florida's Appellate Court(s) denial of Petitioner's timely and duly filed Petition's for Appeal, without any judicial reasoning or analysis to… |
| 19-5206 |
Christine Sawicky v. AMC Networks Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
14th-amendment appellate-courts appellate-procedure circuit-split constitutional-rights copyright-law due-process pro-se pro-se-litigant |
How can a plaintiff win a copyright lawsuit when circuit splits exist throughout the 13 appellate courts? Additionally, how can a circuit split exist … |
| 19-5210 |
Therian Wimbush v. Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General of Georgia, et al. |
Georgia |
2019-07-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appeal appeals appellate-procedure civil-rights discretionary-appeal due-process georgia-court-of-appeals georgia-courts incarceration jurisdiction mailbox-rule parental-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant time-limitation |
Should the 'Mailbox Rule' be extended to all notices of appeal that must be filed in the trial court, filed by pro se incarcerated litigants? |
| 19-50 |
John DeRaffele v. United States |
First Circuit |
2019-07-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals fair-housing-act federal-district-court federal-question judicial-procedure judicial-proceedings jury-verdict pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation standing tenant-standing writ-of-certiorari |
Does a Pro Se litigant have the right to request a Writ of Certiorari when the Court of Appeals has upheld a lower Court ruling on an important Federa… |
| 19-25 |
Irma Rosas v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-07-03 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
accepted-and-usual-course certiorari civil-procedure civil-rights due-process erickson-v-pardus judicial-proceedings legal-standard pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing supreme-court-review |
Whether the lower court, in conflict with this Court's holding in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007), so far departed from the accepted and usual … |
| 19-5040 |
Jennifer Lu v. Stanford University |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-procedure-amendment complaint-amendment dismissal district-court-procedure due-process judicial-guidance leave-to-amend legal-notice pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness |
Whether when granting a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must identify the complaint deficiencies so that the pro se lit… |
| 18-9373 |
David Shu v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination-claim due-process jury-trial-right pleading-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-dismissal standing title-vii |
Whether a Title VII discrimination case drafted by a pro se US citizen has been improperly dismissed for length despite the viability of the claims? |
| 18-1452 |
Jose A. Perez v. Physician Assistant Board, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-05-21 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment 42-usc-1983 amendment civil-procedure constitutional-amendment constitutional-claim due-process equal-protection federal-rules-civil-procedure pro-se-litigant statute-of-limitations takings williamson-county |
Whether Mr. Perez can amend his complaint to allege that a State cannot exclude a person from the practice of medicine in a manner that contravenes th… |
| 18-9247 |
Hitoshi Ombe v. Susana Martinez, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-05-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
autism-disability civil-rights cognitive-ability competency competency-ability disability due-process emotional-damages executive-function instrumental-aggression knowledge-of-disability legal-competency pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation standing |
Does the depressed autism minority have adequate competency or ability to litigate on his own (pro se) without any help or support? |
| 18-9169 |
Andre McDaniels v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2255 6th-amendment appeal appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-reporter due-process fifth-amendment judicial-review jurisdiction pro-se-litigant sixth-amendment standing transcripts |
Does a pro-se petitioner forfeit his constitutional rights when denied opportunity to have merits heard? |
| 18-1407 |
Anita M. Barrow v. B. Grant Willis, et al. |
First Circuit |
2019-05-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights civil-rights-act congressional-intent constitutional-violation discrimination due-process equitable-tolling fair-housing-act federal-jurisdiction pro-se-litigant |
Should the First Circuit Court have applied the doctrine of equitable tolling regarding Appellant's tardy brief and heard the merits of the case with … |
| 18-1390 |
Rochell Talley v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process foreclosure notice-requirements pro-se pro-se-litigant standing time-limits |
Whether the appeal was wrongfully dismissed after the pro se litigant took measurable acts to protect the merits of his appeal after it was erroneousl… |
| 18-9129 |
Delroy T. Booth v. Trevonza Bobbitt, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights court-costs court-fees dismissal docketing-fees due-process eleventh-circuit fees in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing the petitioner's appeal by stating 'Failed to Pay the Docketing & Filing Fee… |
| 18-8837 |
Frizzell Carrell Woodson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-standing due-process federal-tort-claims-act judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct notice pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process sovereign-immunity standing sua-sponte-dismissal |
Whether a trial court should render a sua sponte decision to dismiss an informa pauperis pro se litigant first pleaded affidavit to commenced civil ac… |
| 18-8838 |
Frizzell Carrell Woodson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-standing due-process due-process-clauses federal-tort-claims-act in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigant sovereign-immunity standing |
Whether, When, and to What extent raised therefor, a civil action is commenced |
| 18-8839 |
Frizzell Carrell Woodson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-standing due-process federal-tort-claims-act frivolous-claims in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant sovereign-immunity standing |
Whether the Supreme Court has clearly established uniformity precedent for pro-se litigants' procedural due process rights under 28 USC § 1915 screeni… |
| 18-8685 |
Ervin Thomas v. Cathy A. Jess, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-04-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-district-court habeas-corpus pleading-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation standing time-bar |
Whether a federal district court should deny petitioners petitions for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely and failed to issue a certificate of appeal… |
| 18-1232 |
Al Zeiny v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process emotional-distress fbi-investigation federal-tort-claims-act free-speech government-misconduct intelligence-agency intelligence-agency-misconduct mental-health pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether Zeiny's rights would prevail over the CIA's power |
| 18-8354 |
Anthony K. Anderson v. Jerry Howell, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights district-court due-process exhaustion-doctrine federal-district-court federal-habeas habeas-corpus post-conviction post-conviction-review pro-se pro-se-litigant protective-petition standing |
Whether a Federal District Court Unfairly Precluded pro se Prisoner Litigant Anthony Anderson's Future Ability to a Federal Habeas Review of his Nevad… |
| 18-8170 |
In Re William Edward Cloninger |
|
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-appeal civil-rights congress-legislation constitutional-claims due-process eleventh-circuit equal-protection legal-reform prison-litigation pro-se-litigant procedural-dismissal statute-of-limitations |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments were violated by the dismissal of his appeal |
| 18-1091 |
Afoluso Adesanya, et vir v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. |
Third Circuit |
2019-02-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-court-review civil-rights discovery discovery-violation due-process employment-discrimination ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications judicial-conduct judicial-sanctions pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation sanctions |
Dismissal of petitioner's employment discrimination lawsuit as a sanction without prior court finding or warning of discovery violation |
| 18-7998 |
Bobby Charles Byrd v. W. W. Lindsey, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-02-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
ada-accommodation appointment-of-counsel civil-rights disability-rights due-process exceptional-circumstances judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigant rehabilitation-act |
Does the district court have an obligation to appoint counsel for an ADA-eligible pro se pauper litigant prevented from conducting their own trial due… |
| 18-8000 |
Allister Freeman v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts aedpa-limitations aedpa-time-limitations circuit-court-precedent civil-rights diligence due-process equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances habeas-corpus holland-test indigent-prisoner law-library law-library-access prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals precedent in Dodds v. United States and Atkins v. United States, denying equitable tolling to a pro-se i… |
| 18-8008 |
Cedrick Euron Draper v. Muy Pizza Southeast LLC, dba Pizza Hut |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-15 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-courts'-review-of-a-federal-courts'-decr appellate-review detected-fraud-upon-the-court-predominantly-voidab federal-courts fraud-upon-court fraud-upon-the-court immunity impersonation-by-title-18 intentionally-and-unintentionally-protected-or-unp judgment-void judicial-immunity legal-misrepresentation overrule-frivolous-defiance pro-se-ligitant's-defense-not-identified-to-author pro-se-litigant procedural-defiance voidable-judgment |
fraud upon the court |
| 18-7959 |
Paul David Maze v. Renea Terrell, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
12(b)(6) civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion plra prisoner-rights pro-se-litigant section-1983 standing |
Does a prisoner's §1983 civil matter require a remand if a District Court wrongly equate the standard for frivolousness of a complaint under §1915(d) … |
| 18-7749 |
Ada A. Gonzalez v. Grant Maloy |
Florida |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-jurisdiction appellate-procedure certiorari-review civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-delay mandamus pro-se pro-se-litigant supreme-court-procedure |
Whether the Supreme Court of Florida unjust delay denied Petitioner access for certiorari review |
| 18-7752 |
Mohan A. Harihar v. US Bank NA, et al. |
First Circuit |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-1915 appointment-of-counsel circuit-panel-procedure civil-procedure-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process judicial-recusal jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge legal-complexity pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation recusal standing |
Whether the replacement Circuit Panel repeatedly refused to address/clarify Jurisdiction issues, ultimately denying Petitioner's efforts to resolve a … |
| 18-1004 |
James Seaman v. Westfield Medical Center, L.P., et al. |
Pennsylvania |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure dismissal due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure notice notice-requirement pro-se pro-se-litigant public-policy rules-of-procedure service-of-pleading |
WHETHER THE FAILURE TO SERVE A PLEADING UPON PRO-SE LITIGANTS WARRANTED A FAVORABLE RULING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P 60 AND REMOVAL OF A DISMISSAL OF AN ACTIO… |
| 18-971 |
Faye R. Hobson v. James Mattis, former Secretary of Defense |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ada administrative-exhaustion chevron-deference civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling fmla pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation rehabilitation-act standing title-vii |
Should the doctrine of equitable tolling be expanded to include a pro se party's mistaken belief about filing deadlines |
| 18-7530 |
Tonya Udoh, et vir v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-01-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 1983-claims 1985-claims 4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights davis-v-monroe-county-board due-process emotional-distress false-arrest fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment haines-v-kerner minor-children miranda-rights monell-liability municipal-liability parental-rights pro-se-litigant qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing unconstitutional-statutes |
Whether pro se litigants are held to the same legal standards as counseled litigants |
| 18-7384 |
Michael Deuschel v. USC Faculty Dental Practice, et al. |
California |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ada-accommodation ada-requests-for-accommodation court-reporter disabilities disability-rights due-process equal-protection in-forma-pauperis judicial-access multiple-disabilities pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-petitioner record-on-appeal |
Whether the trial court denials of ADA requests for accommodation from in forma pauperis pro se Petitioner with multiple disabilities, receiving multi… |
| 18-7398 |
Kerry Kruskal v. Peter Sprunt |
New Mexico |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
amended-complaint association-ditch-fees civil-procedure constitutional-rights contested-issues due-process issue-preclusion motion-to-reconsider pro-se-litigant pro-se-representation property-dispute property-rights sanctions standing stored-water-rights summary-judgment surface-water-rights warranty-deed water-rights |
Was the district court correct to adversely rule on Sprunt's summary judgment motion when there were so many legitimate contested issues? |
| 18-7357 |
David T. Frazier v. Stephen Crump, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
1983-suit civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights,due-process,civil-procedure,standing, due-process equal-protection favorable-termination heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey pro-se-litigant section-1983 time-bar |
Is petitioners claims Time Barred Under The Favorable Termination Rule Founded under Heck V. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) When he brought the 1983 su… |
| 18-7268 |
Christopher Berry v. Tom McGinley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-01-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure court-filing-requirements due-process federal-law federal-procedural-rules newly-discovered-evidence pro-se-litigant standing third-circuit-court |
Did the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law in … |
| 18-7191 |
Scott Richard Pendergraft, et ux. v. Network of Neighbors, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-12-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fair-hearing fourteenth-amendment judicial-procedure meaningful-opportunity-to-be-heard pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process procedural-fairness standing substantive-due-process |
Whether a pro se litigant's procedural or substantive due process rights are violated when trial and appellate courts willfully refuse to fully and fa… |
| 18-804 |
Wanda McClure Dry, as Administrator Ad Litem for the Estate of Laurence R. Dry v. Christi Lenay Fields Steele, et al. |
Tennessee |
2018-12-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure due-process estate-administration notice notice-requirement personal-service pro-se-litigant rule-25 rule-4 rule-5 service-of-process |
Does Rule 5 service by mail to a deceased pro se party satisfy the due process requirement of notice and opportunity to be heard prior to the taking o… |
| 18-782 |
William C. Bond v. United States, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-20 |
Denied |
|
amendment circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process leave-to-amend pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether a district court must provide a reason for denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint |
| 18-6730 |
William Ramirez, et ux. v. Superior Court of California, El Dorado County, et al. |
California |
2018-11-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure default default-judgment due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment merits-based-adjudication pro-se pro-se-litigant relief-from-default state-court state-court-procedure |
Should a pro se petitioner reasonably expect relief from default as a part of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitu… |
| 18-633 |
Gary Jefferson Byrd v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-11-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeals appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights district-court district-court-summary-denial due-process fifth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigant standing summary-denial |
Should a Certificate of Appealability (COA) be denied to a pro se litigant thus denying an appeal when the issue has been extensively researched and c… |
| 18-6501 |
Carl A. Robertson v. Interactive College of Technology, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cat's-paw-theory civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination evidentiary-rules mcdonnell-douglas-framework pretext pro-se pro-se-litigant scheduling-order standing summary-judgment title-vii |
Should a pro se litigant's First Proposed Heightened Amended Complaint be unfairly denied by courts based on not following Scheduling Order, undue del… |
| 18-6326 |
Terry Alfred Coxe v. Daniel White, Superintendent, Washington State Corrections Center |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aedpa aedpa-limitations civil-rights counsel-abandonment due-process equitable-tolling fair-trial habeas-corpus ineffective-counsel pro-se-litigant sixth-amendment statute-of-limitations |
Whether the lower courts' rulings directly conflict with the holdings in (1) McQuiggin v. Perkins; (2) Cronic v. United States, and (3) Cuyler v. Sull… |
| 18-6314 |
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-10-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appointment-of-counsel career-offender civil-rights,due-process,criminal-procedure,senten criminal-procedure due-process excessive-sentences habeas-corpus pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process right-to-bail right-to-counsel sentence-enhancements sentencing speedy-trial |
Whether the denial of appealability of case no. 17-1243 was proper when the issues of career offender, enhancements of priors, and excessive sentences… |
| 18-6263 |
Ilich Vargas v. John McMahon, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-09 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights civil-rights-complaint constitutional-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct pleading pro-se-litigant recusal screening section-1983 standing |
Whether a district court judge and a magistrate conducting a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 IFP screening acted on an excess of discretion and beyond the limits of … |
| 18-401 |
Faye Rennell Hobson v. James Mattis, Secretary of Defense |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-09-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
bias civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process due-process-violation evidence fifth-amendment judicial-bias legal-standard pro-se pro-se-litigant united-states-constitution |
What is the level of bias that must be demonstrated before it constitutes a violation of a pro se litigant's right to due process guaranteed by the Fi… |
| 18-6109 |
Keerut Singh v. United States Postal Service |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure civil-procedure de-novo-review due-process foia foia-request judicial-procedure privacy-act pro-se-litigant standard-of-review summary-judgment |
Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to comply with its own precedents under 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 and 552a |
| 18-6107 |
Jacob Logan Stone v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-09-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process notice opportunity-to-be-heard pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-bar procedural-bars reentry summary-affirmance supervised-release |
Does the 8th Circuit's practice of denying pro se litigants the opportunity to brief their appeal deny the basic requirements of Due Process, notice a… |
| 18-6102 |
Anthony Mayes, Jr. v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2018-09-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-proceedings due-process federal-statutes judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-default trial-counsel |
Whether a pro se litigant's failure to address on direct appeal trial counsel's procedural default of client's fundamental due process rights, for app… |
| 18-239 |
Arick Justin Rinaldo v. Bryan Mahan, et al. |
Colorado |
2018-08-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights colorado-supreme-court-rules court-access due-process equal-protection filing-system pro-se pro-se-litigant structural-error |
Whether the deprivation of access to Colorado's ICCES filing system for pro se litigants caused reversible structural error and discriminated against … |
| 18-5643 |
Nathan Craft v. Willie Bonds, Administrator, South Woods State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2018-08-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment consent-search fourth-amendment habeas-corpus pro-se-litigant schneckloth-v-bustamonte stone-v-powell |
When pro-se litigant's 4th amendment consent search claim is misunderstood and misstated, can Stone v. Powell standard be applied to consent search is… |
| 18-5410 |
Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure district-court due-process federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure good-faith good-faith-appeal in-forma-pauperis informal-form-brief ninth-circuit pro-se pro-se-litigant statement-of-reasons written-reasons |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in not permitting the petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization |
| 18-5244 |
Josef Michael Jensen v. Raymond Madden, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-right counsel-assistance due-process habeas-corpus indigent-rights ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-litigant right-to-counsel standing state-post-conviction state-procedural-framework |
Does an indigent pro se prisoner have a constitutional right to counsel and necessary financial assistance in an initial-review-collateral-proceeding? |
| 23A892 |
Alfred Correa Dizon v. Vectrus Systems Corporation |
Fifth Circuit |
|
Presumed Complete |
|
booklet-format court-procedure docketing-fee filing-extension pro-se-litigant supreme-court-rules |
Whether a pro se litigant may obtain an extension of time to pay docketing fees and submit required Supreme Court booklets under Rule 38(a) and Rule 3… |