No. 20-699

Michael Sammons v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure frivolous frivolous-litigation mandamus mandamus-review pro-se-litigant sanctions standing voluntary-dismissal
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2020-12-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntary dismissal under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (i) Whether, as the Ninth Circuit has held, a plaintiff has an “absolute right” to voluntary dismissal under FRCP, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G), if no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed, or whether, as in the Fifth Circuit, courts have the discretion to disregard such a dismissal. A circuit split exists on this question, with the Ninth Circuit holding that the right is “absolute,” while the Fifth Circuit holds the right is subject to court “discretion.” Gi) | Whether generally a pro se litigant should receive at least one warning before a monetary sanction is imposed for presenting a “frivolous” issue, in this case a sanction for seeking mandamus review to challenge refusal to allow a FRCP, Rule 41(a)(a)(A)@ voluntary dismissal. 2 Z

Docket Entries

2020-12-14
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent George Economou to respond filed.
2020-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Dryships Inc. to respond filed.
2020-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Dryships Inc.
Bruce Gordon PaulsenSeward & Kissel LLP, Respondent
Bruce Gordon PaulsenSeward & Kissel LLP, Respondent
George Economou
Daniel Adam RubensOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Respondent
Daniel Adam RubensOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Respondent
Michael Sammons
Michael Sammons — Petitioner
Michael Sammons — Petitioner