| 21-6451 |
Ada Maria Benson v. IHSS DPSS, In Home Supportive Services, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-11-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-procedure frivolous-litigation labor-law standing wage-theft workplace-assault |
Question not identified |
| 20-699 |
Michael Sammons v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-11-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure frivolous frivolous-litigation mandamus mandamus-review pro-se-litigant sanctions standing voluntary-dismissal |
Whether a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntary dismissal under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) |
| 18-8806 |
Marguerite Dutton v. Nikkisha P. McCrea |
Pennsylvania |
2019-04-15 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection frivolous-litigation medical-malpractice pa-constitution pennsylvania-constitution us-constitution-14th-amendment |
Whether Pa. Rule 231.1 (frivolous litigation) violates Article I Section 26 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (No discrimination by commonwealth and it… |
| 18-1228 |
Barbara Mrzlak Brundo v. Christ the King Church of Omaha |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-03-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights defamation due-process employment estate-administration estate-litigation frivolous-litigation judicial-retaliation ministerial-exception probate-court retaliation rule-11-sanctions |
Whether Rule 11 sanctions paid by petitioner for alleged frivolous complaints should be returned with interest |
| 18-90 |
Colonial School District v. Rena C. |
Third Circuit |
2018-07-20 |
Denied |
|
abuse-of-discretion attorney-fees buckhannon-board-and-care-home buckhannon-rule catalyst-theory disabilities-education frivolous-litigation individuals-with-disabilities-education-act-2004 individuals-with-disabilities-education-improvemen pierce-v-underwood plenary-review settlement-offer |
Whether the court of appeals' decision regarding the phrase 'substantially justified' fails to follow Pierce v. Underwood and conflicts with Gary G. v… |