No. 20-6838

Jason Sinagwana Nsinano, aka Jason Nsinano v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-detention civil-procedure civil-rights conditional-release due-process habeas-corpus jurisdictional-mootness mootness pleading-standards pro-se-litigant standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a lower federal court loses jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition upon release of the civil detention petitioner

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A) Whether a lower federal court loses its jurisdiction over a petition for writ of habeas corpus upon release of the civil detention petitioner, albeit with conditions and restrictions, or if and how the mootness question applies to confinement in the civil arena. . B) What level of precision of pleading suffices for pro se litigants, for the lower court to be bound under : this Court’s Castro v. United States, (2001) and its progeny, and for petitioner’s filing to survive a district court’s potential use of a dismissal without leave to amend: when filing for a Writ of habeas corpus. ii ,

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General to respond filed.
2021-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2021)

Attorneys

Jason S. Nsinano
Jason Sinagwana Nsinano — Petitioner
Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent