Should a Pro Se Litigant in a products-liability case be given the same or similar Constitutional protection and liberties as Pro Se criminal defendants

QUESTION PRESENTED Should a Pro Se Litigant in a products-liability case be given the same or similar Constitutional protection and liberties as Pro Se criminal defendants with the-Court’s insight and wisdom utilized in Gideon v. : Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 when he cannot afford counsel in a non; frivolous products-liability case involving strict liability? PARTIES . ‘. ° The Petitioner Mikequale Miller who was a minor at the time of the cause of action was also the injured party in this matter. The respondents are Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, ; ~ Inc., Northeastern Technical, Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., and Baja, Inc. Motorsports who are ; the parties responsible for Petitioner’s irreparable injuries.