No. 19-5844
James Arthur Ross v. John Myrick, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 9th-circuit-ruling civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights district-court-error due-process evidence expert-testimony precedent pro-se-litigant standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court error in determining that a 9th Circuit Appellate ruling from almost two decades ago in Bahrampour v. Lampert, 356 F.3d 969, 976 (9th Cir. 2004), outrightly barred any litigation on the matters no matter how similar or different and especially when the passage of time has produced evidence that is in direct conflict with the decision in that case?
Question Presented (from Petition)
LIST OF ALL PARTIES *All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-10
Waiver of right of respondents Brigitte Amsberry, et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Brigitte Amsberry, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent