Whether the right to present evidence in an appeals court is Constitutionally protected

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Third Circuit Court of Appeals erred in deliberately repeating the district court’s errors in factfinding and the application of law and in discriminating against pro se litigants with the hand of a law clerk through a memdispo. This Court has supervisory power under Supreme Court Rule 10(a) to deter such conduct. 1. Whether the right to present evidence in an appeals court is Constitutionally protected. -2. Whether an appeals court should recognize a pro se litigant’s right to present evidence and to review the presented evidence. 3. Whether pro se litigants should be willfully discriminated against and bullied to result in a second tier of the judicial system in violation of equal justice under the law.