| 24-5701 |
Harold David Yaritz v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-10-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
complaint-amendment constitutional-rights document-interpretation judicial-discretion legal-procedure procedural-due-process |
Whether the District Court and Appellate Court improperly dismissed a complaint by disregarding substantive constitutional rights and procedural due p… |
| 23-6913 |
Carl Thompson v. Marjorie K. Allard, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals of Alaska, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-03-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion circuit-court civil-procedure complaint-amendment federal-courts futile-amendment futility-standard judicial-discretion procedural-review rooker-feldman standing |
Was there a violation of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine? |
| 23A746 |
Carlos Jackson v. Markel American Insurance Company, et al. |
Nevada |
2024-02-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-rights complaint-amendment due-process judicial-discretion medical-emergency pro-se-litigant |
Whether a pro se litigant's constitutional due process rights are violated when a district court judge denies an opportunity to amend a complaint and … |
| 23-833 |
Zachary Greenberg v. Jerry Lehocky, in His Official Capacity as Board Chair of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-02-02 |
Denied |
Amici (7) |
article-iii civil-rights complaint-amendment ethics-rule free-speech jurisdiction legal-jurisdiction mootness standing standing-inquiry time-of-filing-rule |
Does amending or supplementing a complaint to include new factual developments absolve the government of its burden to prove mootness? |
| 22-6799 |
Emeka Dominic Okongwu v. County of Erie, New York |
Second Circuit |
2023-02-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment appellate-review civil-procedure complaint-amendment district-court due-process judicial-procedure reconsideration second-circuit standing summary-judgment |
Did the court of appeals err in affirming the district court's refusal to allow amendment of the complaint? |
| 22-5954 |
David Florence v. S. Frauenheim, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts amending-complaint civil-rights complaint-amendment court-retaliation due-process grievance-filing legal-procedure qualified-immunity retaliation |
Whether respondent can intentionally falsify their report to the court to obtain qualified immunity |
| 21-6913 |
Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn v. Sergeant Bowman, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-01-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
cell-phone-data complaint-amendment digital-privacy district-court-discretion fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence judicial-error leave-to-amend privacy pro-se-pleading procedural-due-process search-and-seizure |
Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable … |
| 20-1602 |
Cornelius S. Berry, et ux. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-05-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
adjournment amend-complaint case-adjournment circuit-court-review civil-procedure complaint-amendment due-process judicial-discretion motion-to-dismiss procedural-dismissal standing |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in affirming the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mich… |
| 20-6239 |
Abdul Mohammed v. Prairie State Legal Services, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-11-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment civil-procedure complaint-amendment dismissal district-court notice pro-se rule-8 |
Whether a District Court can dismiss a Pro Se Plaintiff's complaint under Rule 8 without giving an opportunity to amend the complaint at least once af… |
| 20-5495 |
Ruben Sanchez v. United States, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-08-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights complaint-amendment due-process federal-court federal-court-jurisdiction immunity marginalized-defendants pro-se standing state-actor-immunity |
Does a pro se plaintiff have the right to appointment of counsel to amend a complaint challenging state-actor-immunity? |
| 19-7064 |
Johanna Beanblossom v. Bay District Schools |
Florida |
2019-12-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment civil-procedure complaint-amendment due-process due-process-amendment employment-law first-amendment retaliation school-employment summary-judgment |
Absent unfair delay or futility, does fundamental due process require that a Plaintiff be allowed to amend a complaint at least once before a Court's … |
| 19-5040 |
Jennifer Lu v. Stanford University |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-procedure-amendment complaint-amendment dismissal district-court-procedure due-process judicial-guidance leave-to-amend legal-notice pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness |
Whether when granting a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must identify the complaint deficiencies so that the pro se lit… |
| 18-712 |
Jerry Artrip v. Ball Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-03 |
Denied |
|
amendment civil-procedure claim-dismissal complaint-amendment district-court federal-circuit judicial-review patent patent-infringement standing |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of Petitioner's patent infringeme… |