Whether the District Court and Appellate Court improperly dismissed a complaint by disregarding substantive constitutional rights and procedural due process in favor of technical document interpretation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1) How can a legal system in "the Land of ‘the Free" side by superficial reasoning with officials who abuse their power of authority to repress others of their Constitutional rights instead of following their ethical obligation to apply true justice? Is this not what "an attack on democarcy" is all about? 2) How can the District Court claim that the document titled "2nd Amendment of Complaint" (instead of "Second Amended Complaint") supersedes the:original complaint when it is per dictionary a CORRECTION (or clarification), and not a change in the complaint in itself which Rule 8 only addresses? 3) How can the District Court and the US Appellate Court dismiss a serious complaint by instead of looking at the serious issues brought forward in the original complaint only considering the "2nd Amendment of Complaint" which a) is obvious to any layman only an intended clarification of Defendants, and b) which the District Court never accepted in the first place as it did not , add the State of Minnesota as a defendant as requested in the "2nd Amendment of Complaint"? | 4) How can the District Court ignore complaint when . a) it advised Petitioner that an "AMENDED COMPLAINT" would supersede the | original complaint, whereof b) Petitioner drafted a "2ND AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT" to only clarify defendants | and their role named in the original complaint? ; 5) How can a legal institution designed to uphold the law. allow, and even participate in derogatory measures (going negative when the opponent cannot be beat by standing out has become in American politics quite the norm) to defame the. complaint about a sérious: violation of Constitutional rights by discrediting | the Petitioner by his conviction that has nothing to do‘with this complaint? | 6) How can any legal authority (here Attoney General Corinne Wright; specificakly ehe ofsthe:six institutions of the DOC namely Faribault; AND the District Court) treat specific convicts differently even when there is no provision in law/ > policy to do so, which-is a trend in a Nation which sexual negativity (driven by the religious misinformation on Adam & Evey increases not only sexual crimes in the first place? ,