| 24-1043 |
Edward Plummer, Jr. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al. |
California |
2025-04-01 |
Denied |
|
court-notification judicial-system leave-to-amend litigant-rights pro-se substantive-due-process |
Does our judicial system deny pro se litigants substantive due process when the courts are remise in ensuring that such litigants are timely and prope… |
| 24A267 |
Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-09-16 |
Presumed Complete |
|
article-iii-standing declaratory-judgment fifth-amendment leave-to-amend ninth-circuit redressability |
Whether the Ninth Circuit improperly restricted Article III standing requirements by imposing additional barriers to declaratory relief beyond the Sup… |
| 21-8222 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fifth-amendment judicial-discretion leave-to-amend pro-se pro-se-litigants standards-of-practice standing |
Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits federal courts from holding pro se litigants to the same stringent standards as attorneys |
| 21-6913 |
Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn v. Sergeant Bowman, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-01-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
cell-phone-data complaint-amendment digital-privacy district-court-discretion fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence judicial-error leave-to-amend privacy pro-se-pleading procedural-due-process search-and-seizure |
Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable … |
| 21-6153 |
Suran Wije v. David A. Burns, et al. |
Texas |
2021-11-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-liberties due-process equal-protection equal-rights fourteenth-amendment immunity leave-to-amend liberty nondisclosure qualified-immunity sovereign-immunity |
Do the interests of 'justice so require' a leave to amend, when purposeful obfuscation, legal trickery, and nondisclosed affirmative defenses like imm… |
| 20-8274 |
RaySean D. Barber v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-06-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights complaint-deficiencies district-court due-process equal-protection indigent-claims leave-to-amend meaningful-review prisoner-claims standing |
Whether the district court's finding with regard to Mr. Barber's equal-protection-claim conflicted with this-Court's-governing-determinations |
| 20-1572 |
Ramon D. Johnson, II v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-05-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
brand-name-liability brand-name-manufacturer FDA-approval generic-drug generic-drug-liability label-defect leave-to-amend preemption product-liability state-law-claims texas-presumption-of-no-liability unapproved-indication |
Whether a brand name drug manufacturer can be held liable for the defective label of a generic drug product |
| 20-208 |
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Ethan Volungis, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-08-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
amendment civil-procedure district-court federal-rules-of-civil-procedure leave-to-amend motion-to-dismiss represented-plaintiff rule-15 sua-sponte |
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) requires district courts to grant plaintiffs represented by counsel leave to amend their complaint sua s… |
| 19-8827 |
David Fowler v. Indymac Bank, FSB, et al. |
New York |
2020-06-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure collateral-estoppel complaint-dismissal court-of-appeals due-process judicial-review leave-to-amend motion-for-leave state-court-jurisdiction |
Whether the State of New York Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's motion for leave to appeal without detailed reasoning |
| 19-8526 |
Quintez Talley v. Timothy Mazzocca, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights failure-to-state-claim judicial-discretion leave-to-amend mail-fraud pro-se-plaintiff racketeer-influenced-and-corrupt-organizations-act screening-phase standing supplemental-jurisdiction wire-fraud |
Does the inability to show concrete financial loss deprive a plaintiff of standing when bringing a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RIC… |
| 19-562 |
Brian Burke v. New York City Transit Authority, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-10-29 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 ada civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation defamation due-process fair-labor-standards-act first-amendment leave-to-amend pleading-standards pro-se pro-se-litigation standing state-statute title-vii unconstitutionality |
Pleading standards for pro se parties in Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 1983, and ADA cases |
| 19-6324 |
Taeng Yang v. Michael McNeill, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-10-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights conviction-vacatur due-process heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey leave-to-amend section-1983 statute-of-limitations wallace-v-kato |
Whether Yang's § 1983 claims begins to accrue on the date his conviction was 'vacated and overturned' in light of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-… |
| 19-425 |
Veronica W. Ogunsula v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-10-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis leave-to-amend notice notice-requirement pleading-standards procedural-dismissal standing statutory-interpretation |
What is the meaning of 28-U.S.C.-Section-1915-(e)-(2)-(b)-(ii) |
| 19-5040 |
Jennifer Lu v. Stanford University |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-procedure-amendment complaint-amendment dismissal district-court-procedure due-process judicial-guidance leave-to-amend legal-notice pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness |
Whether when granting a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must identify the complaint deficiencies so that the pro se lit… |
| 18-782 |
William C. Bond v. United States, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-20 |
Denied |
|
amendment circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process leave-to-amend pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant standing |
Whether a district court must provide a reason for denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint |
| 18-780 |
Lisa Marie Kerr v. Marshall University Board of Governors, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
12(b)(6)-motion academic-deference civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act due-process first-amended-complaint first-amendment leave-to-amend savings-statute sex-discrimination sexual-orientation sexual-orientation-discrimination |
Is sexual orientation discrimination unlawful under the Civil Rights Act? |