No. 21-8222
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fifth-amendment judicial-discretion leave-to-amend pro-se pro-se-litigants standards-of-practice standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits federal courts from holding pro se litigants to the same stringent standards as attorneys
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits federal courts from holding pro so litigants to the same stringent standards as attorneys? 2. Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits federal courts from denying leave to amend when no bad faith, undue delay, prejudice to opposing party, nor futility are shown or demonstrated? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-20
Waiver of right of respondents Frakes, Dir., NE DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2022-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Frakes, Dir., NE DOC, et al.
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent