No. 21-6153

Suran Wije v. David A. Burns, et al.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2021-11-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-liberties due-process equal-protection equal-rights fourteenth-amendment immunity leave-to-amend liberty nondisclosure qualified-immunity sovereign-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the interests of 'justice so require' a leave to amend, when purposeful obfuscation, legal trickery, and nondisclosed affirmative defenses like immunity enable the crushing of Americans' inalienable and equal rights like liberty?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Despite the freedoms and privileges of U.S. citizenship, for over 17 years, petitioner has been imprisoned within an illiberal democracy’, having lost his home (absolute immunity), his education (sovereign immunity), and his employment (qualified immunity). Regarding this lawsuit, upon discovering a due process or nondisclosure . trap—known only to the courts and the respondents but not to the unrepresented petitioner—a leave to amend for corrective action was denied. . Issue 1: Perfidy Nondisclosure Trap — Do the interests of ‘justice so require’ a leave to amend, when purposeful obfuscation, legal trickery, and nondisclosed . affirmative defenses like immunity enable the crushing of Americans’ inalienable and equal rights like liberty? . Issue 2: Macro Sovereign Immunity — Notwithstanding Eleventh Amendment state sovereign immunity, are state-bankrolled discrimination (secretly segregated meeting) and retaliation (alleged bribed blacklisting?) immunity-cabined by Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment and buttressed by the still-standing legal precedent of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer (1976)? , , Issue 3: Micro Qualified Immunity — Although southern Governor George Wallace later apologized for screaming, “Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!” that invidious attitude remains veiled within the hearts and minds of some Americans; therefore, is qualified immunity cabined by Hope v. Pelzer (2002) when ‘segregation now’ (secretly segregated meeting) and ‘segregation forever’ (alleged bribed blacklisting?) are still practiced by some state officials? while financed by all taxpayers’ dollars? | : | i } 1 The word “liberal” is not stated in a political-parties sense such as conservative or liberal. It arises out of the root verb “liberate,” meaning to set free. Thus, in an illiberal democracy, elections and voting occur as in normal western liberal democracies; however, due to a strong state or government with unrestrained powers or immunities, its citizens lack basic inalienable and civil liberties such as those enshrined by the United States Bill of Rights. Important article, (Fareed Zakaria, 2021). 2 Please review the appellate filing titled, “Tab 4: Alleged Hush-Money Bribery,” on May 9, 2019 at 11:07 PM for a detailed analysis of this serious allegation. . It is also included in the

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent David A. Burns and The University of Texas at Austin to respond filed.
2021-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)

Attorneys

David A. Burns and The University of Texas at Austin
Scot M GraydonOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Scot M GraydonOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Suran Wije
Suran Wije — Petitioner
Suran Wije — Petitioner