| 22-6650 |
Antonio Rooks-Byrd, aka Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Court of Appeals of Nebraska |
Nebraska |
2023-01-27 |
Dismissed |
appellate-court civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-procedure jurisdiction standing state-appellate-court |
whether-the-fourteenth-amendment-prohibits-a-state-appellate-court-from-adjudicating-an-application-or-motion-in-complete-absence-of-all-jurisdiction |
| 21-8222 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fifth-amendment judicial-discretion leave-to-amend pro-se pro-se-litigants standards-of-practice standing |
Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits federal courts from holding pro se litigants to the same stringent standards as attorneys |
| 20-5781 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel jurisdiction plea-agreement subject-matter-jurisdiction void-conviction |
habeas-corpus |
| 20-5699 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
2020-09-15 |
Denied |
constitutional-error court-jurisdiction due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel jurisdiction plea-agreement void-conviction void-judgment |
issues-being-raised |
| 20A69 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
|
Presumed Complete |
None |
|