No. 21-6913

Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn v. Sergeant Bowman, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: cell-phone-data complaint-amendment digital-privacy district-court-discretion fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence judicial-error leave-to-amend privacy pro-se-pleading procedural-due-process search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Question (8) Fresentte | 1) PlawtiGl File leave to amencl Utogtion histowy hich moqsiar allow to prneecl befue it reach the |elisteict Tube 4 WwOS Corrected before. nis decisions or Nd} eviews He magi shale Cob Fick | Oluew Leptin Nid y WHS 9 esated afer lowe rail He distcid cant allewedt ir to OCreat ? 2) Did the distri count ale its distietion By Ack allewinc, a prO-re compbit fron heowe to Proceed ptt mrreysicite Claay clicl ? S) Dict the disicrd: ceent Cyan He G0 ZL. Conplsint heave to Amect his corp Free ly hei & clomisd ty fay hope Hiskay Ure WLS Galdlecl Ow Leave. ? ) Dict Ho Ashi Duetge. awe. DoerscltshO +o clism(ss Pro-e | comPbust Wheio G Mohan to recuxe sith Bacovit ws Ged timely Bolere he Macle Eling, ? 5) Did tho dish Dude clo eva tol Protect Pro-se Lilicant after Ne tolel im , he WHS Geis, Unrarts mail Frauol , onl cetplieton ? (c) whee ie Aisbict duclge. wohen Ow Ape ket (08 Gney Ne SHlect bert, u pe Keven Filed c Pespoivse] mucl locket Git dl efeuhud ascrehs By wok cortectag Fnimselt which the doled did cheery of @ QuesHiow) (s) Fresettel cat cl “D Did the clesints Ticke commie! false plikements ow He Bewh whey We SAicl\ Ween ihe (eSpoucled| And cleferchek iw docket 6 said | | did ? 9) Dict tho clisteich dude Becaw of 4 GON G5 Hw Basis boy Nes | FECL oF eest sore iic mal Gael, £9 Stolened, Bias, prepelice Cetraud of Covenwmod Fucking Suppose tolOrese prt Proceed we farther But erocre the serude of Brvsthi) Duckke. cact Uhl Yen Upad Ho Finclve, AisqueliCy Nimrelt 2? Y) Because ths Conplsiat Gaal city idvoludan: Mechel Protessiony cid We. cliskvy 3 ce Gb chiscyehicy 3 Gy MOF apPOIK uC, COWL Lohad reqeedet 2 (\ Did the istict ‘Oude alae it cise OW Uchers wot qrading CKPCOHE tO TEL to i alley Bein, ddd over S times of the misCoudhick of delercad of onal Fraud’ a Ce APL EMME LSD oF Usithe Fecal Ube U.S.C. 1512 By kd Croat whet ACen due Cikcate oo the PPO E.R Pequot Loos, Clamted ? Dick te istrict dep lose is cliscleheg Uh ay G uhey GEWied POE PlihF COmsel, dened ex Ate, Cncl made , acl Pes SHICKED bin Con Coy Fuh Mahi ew te vacate. or Rule WO. WF tO wottian HO Lome to dumact Did ho chu hi Ciscoeticn) to vet Qa Clem to mexel, Vacate Moho GO, Bact SNERGS Lin Freon Filixc, ach rbhed iw His caso? Base he wase Ce Hee-stt kan 7 \2) Dict Maquabvate Ocke cil i ASMEHAD io Pefurie, bo Ginout C MISE Lod He clreumstnce ? mecteal caso. (3) Did Moc sires Ducke Pluse i} deohhas whe bed Cured 0 oe | Qveshes Cs} Prexubect Cow cl (3) from lee added adaihewl pedies which isallouet? 4) Did clistid TLcke error iach Glare I ASMehoo UO QVCUhe, decker 41 doychons to dle of Ybighhoo nSery Ube o Utd Gddlécl ow Leswe cach Anal iv thd cOmplaiat 7 1) Did Aisired Ductee error Bid abuses dinehon Chey tt rented Que Nec! iiaAuaty Cacl Summpey Sua nod bo clon estabiscnecl Lod of He CONS ty WEShiKod wv Herr 7 le) Dick dokct Sooke errer act clase his dicmehas Whey be chisMise] POSE CowPbid fer clase of He DucicisL press whith Laas caictct From Losve Rokee. b Cot folim ad the ease. WD Clavel fo peLee P OwDnulic| He clisticd Deco DM Dicl Hoclshel Dicey evror aad axe hic ASME Lhe he WES (EWE O09 3/25/903) cucl Y/15/BODL ack eeuey ciequalited bimgelf Gheo a motiios to recuseol Crk ed ow D Serencke | Gales Before he eves male He evcten|te cles Hee Chae sot to Place Wy Furthen MEHL OF OHen [A925 Lon Plott ow iis clonwe) 69 His cave Rt to ve Ww Yam to 1 Goth apy et ths orden ? 8) Pte Peis told Tht Alike sed for Oars aticbyit eaeis Hot WWGS Loubt seud te hle did Gopals Cols Close ik cliscnettas Cael CCL OLN G prose Ghicadk wh co Hide Lawyer tO (einstale Ins Oppel 7 (A) Ors Aockdt 42 The Magismate Duoke Clowiech Aouler Be cach 3O of dolerchwlo Clin Hebi wosla SB str YUKON cacl AP @ Quek (2) Presented 1G) Tet Hho ca Phe Herne. 1 Fibecd 1 Loca Cul allaved ub to precee] tie eppallidie. cont Dict trey error Clearly cncl couse Heir ciS~ cretion when Hoy tolcl me ay Doug OF, B09 Thet the APPEALS Counts has clateynined | WAS de Pwee-strle

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-03-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent Sergeant Bowman, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Sergeant Bowman, et al.
Lauren S. Bruce — Respondent
Timothy Littlejohn
Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn — Petitioner