1. PA AmLiis alto poe bef t reac the istrict Ju twas corrected be fore his decisiow or his review the magishate cart fding. Divcew Litigtion histy was presatel after leave shald the district cant allawed if to proeed?

2. Did the istrict cont abe its disetio y nt allwing a pro-se comphint from heawe to proceed Afte magistacte clery did?

3. Dict the district cant grant the protse complint heave to Amencl his complaint freely whew he dismiss it for Litigption history thatwis added on heve?

4. Did the istict Jidg have Juridtin to dimiss pro-e complint whew a motiow to recuse ith Afvit ws filed timely Betere he made aroling?

5. pid the distnd Judge do ewagn to protect Proe litignt after he told him, he ws going thrags mail frad, and retAliAtION?

6. wheu the district Jucge whew ow dpcket 68 whew he stAled pro-se litigant Neien filed a resfonse Aud docket 6o defectt Clearly coutracict him And sAd that i did commit abuse of discretion By ot correcting himself which the defebnt did clearly?

7. Did the istct Ju coi f mns he Bec he sAid i vever s respancded And defenctnt iw dlocket 6o7 sAid i did?

8. Dicl tho district Judge Becuse of those actiu cs the Basis for his recust of hovest sencice, mail fraud, fase stotenent, Bics, prejudice clefraud of Goverumoct fuctiow suppose to pease And proceed wo forther But proure the serie of Anth Jidge anc ntil them upau the fidig disqualify himself?

9. Because th compbint dleal with iyvolutAy meclicAtion and mecical protession dict the district judke abuse it discretoo By Not appointing cosel whew requeste?

10. Did the district Judge abse it disonetiow when not qrating exponte,to speak to him after Being tod over 5 times of the miscoulct of delernt, of mai fraud, a fefnAl crine withs orwithet FeconAl LitohoN 18 U. S,C. 1512 By t qrAnt relief Afton due diliqance ow the pro se ploiutiff requfot wces denied?

11. W Did the district Judke ause its disctehow whew on I9 whew devied prose plintiet causely dewied exparte, and master, and thew strickew him fram cwy furtha motiw evew to vacate or Rule 6o. not to mewtiaw the leave to cumad, Did he abuse hs discretion to lot qralt a leare to Amere vacta, motaw 60. And strckew him from filing Ang motiop iw this cAse ? Becase he wesat a three-striker?

12. Did Maqutrate Jke abose it doneta io relsig to grut a m

Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures