No. 19-8827
David Fowler v. Indymac Bank, FSB, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure collateral-estoppel complaint-dismissal court-of-appeals due-process judicial-review leave-to-amend motion-for-leave state-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State of New York Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's motion for leave to appeal without detailed reasoning
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED (i) Whether justice is ultimately served when the State of New York Court of Appeals gave no detailed reasoning in denying Petitioner's motion for leave to appeal. Gi) | Whether the Appellate Division correctly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel in dismissing Petitioner’s complaint without leave to amend.
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)