No. 20-5495
Ruben Sanchez v. United States, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights complaint-amendment due-process federal-court federal-court-jurisdiction immunity marginalized-defendants pro-se standing state-actor-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a pro se plaintiff have the right to appointment of counsel to amend a complaint challenging state-actor-immunity?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does a Pro Se plaintiff have the right to appointment of counsel for the purpose of amending a complaint, which complaint sought to challenge the doctrine of "immunity" for state actors who violate their oaths by ignoring and belittling poor, uneducated and marginalized defendants who lack advantages of money, education and status and are therefore considered otherwise undeserving of respect? 2. Is an action brought to challenge the scope of "immunity" for state actors an appropriate cause of action for a federal court to consider? i
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)
Attorneys
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent