Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals and U.S. District Court decisions conflict with the formulation describing retaliation claims within the U.S. Circuit Courts

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ZL. WHETHER THE US. COURT OF APPEALS AND U.S. DISTRICT CouRT DECISIONS CONFLICT WITH THE FORMULATION DESCRIBING RETALIATION CLAIMS WITHIN THE U.S. CIRCUIT cCoURTS. ab, WHETHER THE U.S. CouRT OF APPEALS AND U.S. DISTRICT COURT BECISIONS CONFLICT WITH THE U.S. SUPREME court's DECISIONS f REGARDING ILLITERATE INDIGENT SEGREQITED PRO se INMATES ACCESS OF THE couRTS, ‘ TH. WHETHER DERENOANT LEAH BEREAN, INTERFERED WITH PETITIONERS ACCESS OF THE COURT DURING “THE APPEAL STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS 84 HER MisconDUCT, AW, WHETHER THE U.S. DISTRICT couRT CREATED AN ‘QUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS ISSUE ITSELF Bu ITS RULING. i NO. wretHee THE DISTI2ICT COURT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED ITS DISCRETION DURING IIS SCREENING BY GOING OUTSIDE THE REVCRD AT THe PLEADING STAGE OF THE PROCEEDING THER BY GNING THE APPERANCE of BIAS. WT, WHETHER THE DISTRICT CouRT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED (TS DISCRETION BY DEEMING THE PRO SE LITIGANT'S INITIAL MOTION Foie INJUNCTIVE RELIEF As A U2 U.S.C, 8 19483 COMPLAINT , MOT. WHETHER “THE DISTRICT COURT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED ITS BISCRESTION BY CONSTRUING PETITIONER'S P2O SIE MOTION Po CONSIDERATION AS A MOTION To ALTER Of AMENDS JUDGMENT UNDER RULE $4 Ce), it LAW LIBRARIAN LicAH BEREAN DEPENDANT APPELLEE LES PARISH, WARDIEN DEFENDANT APPELLEE fa DiRELTOR OF MICHIGAN DERAzTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEID, &, WASHINGTON QEFENOWT APPELLEE . tht “