Whether equitable tolling of the certiorari deadline is appropriate when an attorney provides incorrect deadline information to a pro se litigant

No question identified. : EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE WRIT OF CERTIORARI A party may file a motion to stay the remittitur pending application to the Supreme Court of The United States of America for writ of certiorari. Appellant is requesting an extension of time to file his writ of certiorari sixty days from February 11, 2024, due to miscommunication of 90-day deadline from November 13, 2024. Appellant was informed by an appeals attorney over the phone in November 2023, that appellant had 120 days to file a timely writ of certiorari before March 13, 2024. Appellant is requesting his extension to be granted with the United States Supreme Court for this legal mistake by a licensed attorney. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Appellant, respectfully requests, that the United States Supreme Court GRANTS, an extension of 60 days from February 11, 2024, to file appellant’s writ of certiorari with a licensed, due to wrong legal deadline information given to appellant mistakenly by an appeals attorney over the phone in November 2023. DATED: February 9, 2024 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Carlos Jackson CARLOS JACKSON 10170 W Tropicana Avenue, Ste. 156 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 (310) 924-5135 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CARLOS JACKSON, No. 84824 Appellant, vs. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC; TIMOTHY M. STRONG; AND JUSTIN J. BUSTOS, Respondents. CARLOS JACKSON, ‘ No. 85139 Appellant, vs. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC; TIMOTHY M. STRONG; AND JUSTIN J. BUSTOS, Respondents. _ | ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REVIEW Review denied. NRAP 40B. It is so ORDERED. Stiglich Cadish Pickering Herndon Lee , Parraguirre Bell Supreme Court es 22, -BtoBaZ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 9th day of February 2024, I served a true and correct copy of the forgoing APPELLANT’S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE WRIT OF CERTIORARI by way of electronic service and U.S. MAIL, to the following: Justin J. Bustos, Esq. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 100 W. Liberty Street, Suite 940 Reno, Nevada 89501 Attorney for Defendants Markel American Insurance Company, Amy Powell, Bernard McGroarty, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Timothy M. Strong and Justin J. Bustos Supreme Court of Nevada Court of Appeals of Nevada District Court 8" Circuit of Nevada Attention; Clerks Office 201 S. Carson St #201 Carson City, NV 89701 /s/ Carlos Jackson CARLOS JACKSON