Did the court below err in not considering the issue that pro se litigants in Texas justice courts are treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice courts in violation of the equal-protection, due-process, 14th-amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the court below err in not considering the | issue that pro se litigants in Texas justice courts are : | treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice courts in | violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the due process clauses of the Fifth and | Fourteenth Amendments? . 2. Did the court below err in not considering the issue that pro se litigants in Harris County justice courts are treated unequally from all litigants in non-justice courts in Harris County in violation of the equal protection -clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the due process : clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? , : 3. Did the court below err in not considering that the filing of a sworn affidavit of prejudice which is not referred to another judge deprives the challenged judge of personal jurisdiction over an affiant? 4. Did the court below err in not considering the fact that if a judge takes discretionary actions against a litigant without personal jurisdiction, that judge has waived judicial immunity and is subject to civil damages? 5. Did the court below err in not considering the issue that sovereign immunity violates the Constitution, that the United States has no sovereign, and that this British color-of-law anomaly merely serves to protect corrupt government agents and agencies and deny redress of grievances to Americans? 6. Did the court below err in not considering the issue that the "litigation exception" to the Texas Public | . } ws { n : QUESTIONS , Information Act is unconstitutional, that it denies substantive due process and public information to en pro se litigants-who have been denied discovery under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 500.9? .