Josh Albritton v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Question not identified
estions Presertecl IIS Contract Law Supreme ? | 2, Cow O Ste fe Govevament legisla ze Qroune Contyactiad obliga hiss ? 3, 1S The Constitution, oF the Uni tect 57s fes the Suprente Law of the lavel ? Yo Cone a state goverment wuferpret Case Leeks ts prevent a wroustelhy lepe isowcel Petittower from haviwe aery assistance of Counsel , Discavevy, or ever has rights of due process, ZiKe a speech, triad, rich? to face ACCUS OVS , Cha Mes ¢ eviclence, be preset during Feige, to Keep qu bear AMS, Or rights agaust self iucrimughon ? Si Can @ Lowey Court Dewy relict for fotduve to exhavs? arguments atter denylinrs motion for appoivloest of Counsel Fo QGSd DS Pie pertectiag . avguncats ' 6, Cana trial Court Diels ¢ be alloweel to wot hear A ohonw fov production of DAWA. evidence : ofhec being ocolerecd by The Ae 6202Q court of Appeads to hear Scrrol potion Some Two Years AZL quel Phen ol/siy the Leaod Detective ya the ca Se fo olestroy all of the evilence in the Case while appeals were praoking % Caen the DPS.» Cine Leb be allowecd to refuse to =. Turn over exc udpa tors) DA, test results even if . ovclerced ba, a Court fo oto 56 ° (Vi) P Can a Appellete Court den, relict for faidure to Prove actuad (AOC ECE other deny ing roficwu to appoint Counsel ty oss0t with Discovery auch Dewyins Sab poeva tor existing D.wA tes? resud?s e 2, Cam a Rt diocese be Hime or proccecludardy parcel from Yeh) or st Anerchaeat avgumects afrer Parsing Shue V Powe /[? 10. Can A prosecutor Commit oross prosecotsrial misloucdue # by with holedinag Cx cudpators, DAA, evi'dleuce } gull then Vow all evichence ve the Case to be ctestroyecd ? . . le Can Alay Thorson assistaat [Morne Geveval koe albweed to alter eviclewce iu a Fecleral Court Case? 2.6. M04. 19-CV-00227-KEC LEK, District of Ari2owa, Tucson” 12.08 Contract law Supreme? 13,0 the Custituhon of the Uvitect States The Suprene late of the lane ? (vir)