12(b)(6)
9 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-352 | Christopher A. Rogalski v. Laureate Education, Inc. | Third Circuit | 2023-10-03 | Denied | Relisted (3) | 12(b)(6) appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine diversity-jurisdiction due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fifth-amendment forum-non-conveniens forum-selection forum-selection-clause standing | 1. Must the result of a motion to dismiss based upon a claimed forum selection clause under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) be considered the same as a dismissal fo… |
| 23-305 | Larry Rice v. Interfood, Inc., et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2023-09-26 | Denied | Relisted (2) | 12(b)(6) circuit-split civil-procedure contract-breach dismissal federal-jurisdiction merits missouri-law redressability standing summary-judgment | I. Whether a federal court can rule on the merits of a complaint or counterclaim without first ruling on standing. II. Whether the court can decide t… |
| 22-1045 | Robert R. Snyder v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2023-04-27 | Denied | Response Waived | 12(b)(6) civil-procedure dismissal due-process pleading-standards pleadings prisoner-rights rule-12 section-1983 standing | Does Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12 permit a defendant to file successive, pre-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion(s) to dismiss —each towards a sep… |
| 22-689 | Rochelle Y. Driessen v. Barclays Bank, PLC | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-01-25 | Denied | 12(b)(6) 12b6-motion circuit-court-opinion civil-procedure conflict-with-precedent dismissal frivolous frivolous-complaint judicial-review motion-to-dismiss standing | WHETHER THE 11™ CIRCUIT ENTERED THE INCORRECT DECISION IN ITS AUGUST 2, 2022, OPINION OF THE COURT IN ITS AFFIRMANCE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 'S DENIAL O… | |
| 22-16 | Business Exposure Reduction Group (BERG) Associates, LLC v. Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. | Second Circuit | 2022-07-06 | Denied | Response Waived | 12(b)(6) civil-procedure dismissal inference-drawing inferences judicial-discretion motion-to-dismiss pleading-standard pleadings rule-12b6 state-of-mind twombly-standard | Whether the courts below deviated from and disregarded this Court's holding in Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), by granting dismissal … |
| 21-981 | Lan Tu Trinh v. David Fineman | Third Circuit | 2022-01-10 | Denied | 12(b)(6) 12b6-motion appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-immunity pro-se-action quasi-judicial-immunity receiver-appointment section-1983 standing | 1. Did the district court err by granting the receiver's motion to dismiss on immunity grounds under Rule 12(b)(6)? 2. Did the Third Circuit err by b… | |
| 18-1574 | William Henry Starrett v. Department of Defense, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2019-06-25 | Denied | Response Waived | 12(b)(6) appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process factual-allegations federal-jurisdiction federal-rules-of-civil-procedure motion-to-dismiss patent pleading pleading-standards standard-of-review standing takings technology-law | Whether a complaint can survive a motion to dismiss when its factual allegations and claims involve one or more technologies, or capabilities of combi… |
| 18-7959 | Paul David Maze v. Renea Terrell, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2019-02-14 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 12(b)(6) civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion plra prisoner-rights pro-se-litigant section-1983 standing | Does a prisoner's §1983 civil matter require a remand if a District Court wrongly equate the standard for frivolousness of a complaint under §1915(d) … |
| 18-134 | Jennifer Perkins v. US Airways, Inc., et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2018-07-31 | Denied | Response Waived | 12(b)(6) benefits-denial current-employment-status erisa health-benefits medicare-as-secondary-payer medicare-secondary-payer plan-documents summary-judgment unreasonable-denial-of-benefits | Whether the court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims under the Medicare as Secondary Payer Act and ERISA for unreasonable denial of benefits, and… |