Did the court of Appeal Err in Affirming the District Court Decision regarding Jurisdiction over Nursing-Home-Abuse-Cases

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ) | 1. Did the court of Appeal Err in Affirming the District Court Decision regarding Jurisdiction over Nursing Home Abuse Cases. 2. ‘Did the court of appeals err in their decision to not extend jurisdiction due to the violations of the Nursing Home Abuse Act being the eventual cause of Death for Mr. Joe L. Adams Sr. 8. Does the Federal government have jurisdiction in nursing home abuse cases that violate the “Nurs; ing Home Act” when the abuse is the direct primary cause of Death? 4. Did the court of appeals err by not allowing the case to be heard and appoint a lawyer to the pro se litigant suffering reliving the abuse and inju; ries over and over. a. Plaintiff contends that reliving the abuse pictures has been one of the most painful experiences and hopes the Superior Court will allow this case to move forward. 5. Did the court err in not holding Royal Park Nursing and Rehabilitation responsible for its violations of the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (NHRA) of 1987. 6. Did the court err in not holding Royal Park Nurs. ing and Rehabilitation responsible for the painful abuse and eventual slow death of Mr. Joe L. Adams Sr. due to Pressure Ulcers? | me Ce | | | | ii | | QUESTIONS PRESENTED -— Continued | 7. Did the Appeals Court Err in its decision not to allow a court appointed attorney to this case since the Plaintiff had very low income and proceeding Pro Se to fight for his parent? 8. Did the Appeals Court Err in its Denial for a reconsideration based on the fact that the Nursing | Home Reform Act is a Federal Act as well as Med| icaid is a Federal Program? 9. Did the District Court Err in not acknowledging : : the Les Ipsa Loquitur motion submitted by the } plaintiff? | | | | | | iti :