| 25-708 |
Rupert Baptiste v. Fatou Jallow |
Third Circuit |
2025-12-18 |
Pending |
|
due-process fourteenth-amendment haines-v-kerner judicial-act pro-se-rights self-representation |
The United States Constitution grants certain inalienable rights to its citizens. The purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment is to protect people from be… |
| 23-6717 |
Steve Van Horne v. Robert Jones, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-02-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-discretion due-process excusable-neglect federal-rules-of-civil-procedure haines-v-kerner legal-technicalities timeliness united-states-v-lee |
Whether the circumstances surrounding the petitioner's late filing of an appeal qualify as surprise, excusable neglect, and other compelling circumsta… |
| 22-621 |
Linda Matarese, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hilda Duld Bauman, Deceased v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, dba Virginia Hospital Center, et al. |
Virginia |
2023-01-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment haines-v-kerner motion-to-strike pro-se-litigant reasonable-accommodation |
Did the Supreme Court of Virginia violate Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights? |
| 20-8089 |
Emem Ufot Udoh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-05-20 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights davis-v-monroe-county-board due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment haines-v-kerner municipal-liability pro-se-litigation qualified-immunity standing |
Whether pro-se-litigants are held to the same legal standards as counseled-litigants |
| 20-7303 |
John Joseph Barrera v. Jessica Newsome, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-03-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure haines-v-kerner judicial-review pleading-standard prisoner-rights pro-se standing |
Whether the courts below held the pro se prisoner plaintiff to a higher pleading standard |
| 20-6766 |
Steven Justin Villalona v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-01-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 due-process evidentiary-hearing haines-v-kerner ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-recusal pro-se-pleadings recusal section-2255 |
What rights under the Due Process clause do prisoners have during the course of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings? |
| 18-7530 |
Tonya Udoh, et vir v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-01-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 1983-claims 1985-claims 4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights davis-v-monroe-county-board due-process emotional-distress false-arrest fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment haines-v-kerner minor-children miranda-rights monell-liability municipal-liability parental-rights pro-se-litigant qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing unconstitutional-statutes |
Whether pro se litigants are held to the same legal standards as counseled litigants |
| 18-7441 |
James L. Wheeler v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process haines-standard haines-v-kerner judicial-review liberal-construction pro-se pro-se-pleading procedural-fairness standing |
Was the lower Court's Action in failing to allow Liberal Construction of Petitioner's claims in conflict with this Court's holding in Haines v. Kerner… |
| 18-7411 |
David H. Jacob v. Rosalyn Cotton, Chairperson, Nebraska Board of Parole, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-1983 allen-v-mccurry civil-rights collateral-estoppel constitutional-claims due-process failure-to-state-a-claim federal-petition haines-v-kerner parole-board section-1983 |
Can the U.S. District Court, after first finding the Federal Petition does in fact allege federal constitutional claims, summarily dismiss the Federal… |
| 18-6504 |
James D. Russian v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-10-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-defendant criminal-procedure federal-court habeas-corpus haines-v-kerner liberal-construction liberal-construction-rule pro-se pro-se-filings pro-se-pleadings right-to-counsel sixth-amendment substitution-of-counsel |
When a criminal defendant's pro se filings can be stated as a valid basis for substitution of counsel, must a federal court read those filings in such… |