No. 18-7441
James L. Wheeler v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process haines-standard haines-v-kerner judicial-review liberal-construction pro-se pro-se-pleading procedural-fairness standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the lower Court's Action in failing to allow Liberal Construction of Petitioner's claims in conflict with this Court's holding in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Was the lower Court’s Action in failing to allow Liberal Construction of Petitioner’s claims in conflict with this Court’s holding in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972)
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent