| 25A315 |
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-09-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-procedure due-process fifth-amendment motion-to-strike pro-se-litigant summary-judgment |
Whether a federal district court violates a party's due process rights by striking a summary judgment opposition without providing an opportunity to r… |
| 24-720 |
Vitaly Korchevsky v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2025-01-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-error court-of-appeals evidentiary-hearing federal-procedure habeas-corpus motion-to-strike |
Did the Court of Appeals err in ignoring a Motion to Strike the affidavit, denying an evidentiary hearing, and rubber-stamping the district court's de… |
| 23A981 |
Alberta Rose Jones v. Donald David Jones |
Oklahoma |
2024-05-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure jurisdictional-timeliness motion-to-strike procedural-rules supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
Whether a state supreme court can dismiss a petition for writ of certiorari as untimely under procedural rules without addressing the underlying merit… |
| 22-7594 |
Gary V. Jenkins v. United States, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2023-05-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure dismissal district-court district-court-order docket federal-docket judicial-review motion-to-strike related-cases standing supreme-court-procedure |
Will this UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT effectuate the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, ORDER NO. 22-3757 |
| 22-621 |
Linda Matarese, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hilda Duld Bauman, Deceased v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, dba Virginia Hospital Center, et al. |
Virginia |
2023-01-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment haines-v-kerner motion-to-strike pro-se-litigant reasonable-accommodation |
Did the Supreme Court of Virginia violate Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights? |
| 21-842 |
Mark Donelson v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-12-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
civil-litigation civil-procedure class-action federal-rules federal-rules-civil-procedure judicial-discretion motion-to-strike pleading-standards pleadings separation-of-powers standards |
Whether class allegations can be struck under FRCP 12(f) |
| 20-1253 |
Charles L. Stringer v. Storesonline, Inc., et al. |
Mississippi |
2021-03-10 |
Denied |
|
chancery-court civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment motion-to-strike pro-se-representation sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Did the Mississippi Supreme Court break state law when it would not apply the mandatory language in the use of the word 'shall' in Mississippi Code of… |
| 20-894 |
Barbara Andersen v. Village of Glenview, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-01-05 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-procedure due-process motion-to-dismiss motion-to-strike standing summary-judgment trial-court |
Whether the trial court properly disregarded Andersen's Motion to Strike relative to the Motions to Dismiss filed by the Respondents |
| 19-6705 |
Keenan G. Wilkins v. J. Galvin, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeals appellate-jurisdiction arbitration-award civil-procedure dismissal district-court due-process jurisdiction legal-standard manifest-disregard motion-to-strike motion-to-vacate standing |
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to decide an appeal before hearing an oral argument by the appellants, and is the appellants' request for I… |
| 19-6197 |
Donald Steven Reynolds v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-10-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
§2255-motions circuit-court-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-procedural-rules federal-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-discretion jurisdiction local-rule-interpretation local-rules motion-to-strike page-limits statutory-interpretation |
Is the Sixth Circuit's holding in-Martinez v. United States, that the 25 page limit under Local Rule 7.1 applies to §2255 Motions, inconsistant with R… |