| 23-5442 |
Wayne Jerome Johnson v. California |
California |
2023-08-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
constitutional-vagueness criminal-sentencing cruel-and-unusual double-jeopardy due-process felony-misdemeanor penal-code-interpretation three-strikes three-strikes-law vagueness |
Whether it is unconstitutional to impose two separate strikes on Petitioner for the same act under two separate statutes |
| 21-7744 |
Bralen Lamar Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-1915 civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction imminent-danger judicial-review standing three-strikes |
Whether the 'imminent danger' exception to the 'three strikes' rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) applies when the prisoner alleges that something is abou… |
| 21-6192 |
Benjamin Joseph Langford v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-11-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process habeas-relief iowa-robbery-statute johnson-ruling predicate-conviction residual-clause sentencing serious-violent-felony statutory-interpretation three-strikes united-states-v-johnson |
Whether Mr. Langford was improperly denied 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief from his mandatory life sentence |
| 20-7693 |
Keenan G. Wilkins, aka Nerrah Brown v. C. Joksch, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-04-08 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-1915 appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-appeal pro-se-litigant standing three-strikes |
Is a prisoner who is found to have three strikes pursuant to 28 USC 1915 entitled to a one-time appeal on the merits of this finding? |
| 20-5755 |
Joseph Lee Jones v. Google LLC |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-09-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights consumer-protection due-process first-amendment free-speech human-rights in-forma-pauperis legal-remedies three-strikes |
Whether the three strikes provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) violates the right of access to courts, as it is part of the right of petition protected by… |
| 19-1387 |
Waseem Daker v. Theodore Jackson, Sheriff, Fulton County, Georgia, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-06-18 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-challenge first-amendment free-speech in-forma-pauperis prison-litigation-reform-act religious-exercise three-strikes three-strikes-provision |
Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act 'three-strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), is unconstitutional as applied to deny a prisoner access to c… |
| 19-8648 |
Vernon Wayne McNeal v. Fleming, C/O, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law administrative-penalties agency-authority civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction regulatory-compliance standing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation three-strikes |
Question not identified |
| 19-7374 |
In Re John Wallace |
|
2020-01-22 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion appeals civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-authority judicial-discretion mandamus procedural-error sanctions standing three-strikes three-strikes-law three-strikes-statute |
whether-magistrate-judge-exceeded-authority-in-issuing-strike |
| 19-6874 |
In Re Stephen Daniel Leonard |
|
2019-12-06 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-1915 abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure circuit-court-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion judicial-power pro-se-litigation standing three-strikes three-strikes-provision |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion in refusing to file the petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal |
| 19-5367 |
Ralph Arthur Duarte v. California |
California |
2019-07-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus hicks-v-oklahoma liberty-interest people-v-vargas retroactive-application retroactivity three-strikes three-strikes-law |
whether-petitioner-was-denied-due-process-of-law |
| 18-9569 |
Joel Marvin Munt v. Tom Roy, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-06-07 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process judicial-recusal petition-for-appeal plra pro-se-litigation recusal standing three-strikes tro |
Can denial of a Rule 5 Petition for Permission to Appeal be a strike under the PLRA? |
| 18-8365 |
Derrick Scott v. Allen Stark, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-03-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-filing due-process imminent-danger in-forma-pauperis prisoner-rights standing three-strikes |
Whether the middle district Court and Fifth Circuit court of appeals erred in refusing to allow the petitioner to proceed IFP as an indigent prose pri… |
| 18-7006 |
Gordon C. Reid v. Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis plra prisoner-litigation-reform-act standing three-strikes |
Whether the PLRA's 'three strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which bars prisoners from proceeding in forma pauperis if they have had three prior… |
| 18-5559 |
Travis Michael Easter v. Brigitte Amsberry, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-sentencing criminal-sentencing-enhancement due-process factual-innocence habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel legal-innocence miscarriage-of-justice recidivism recidivist-enhancement recidivist-statute sentencing-error three-strikes three-strikes-law |
Whether the state of Oregon's imposition of a true life sentence under a three strikes sentencing recidivist enhancement statute is a miscarriage of j… |