No. 19-7374

In Re John Wallace

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-01-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appeals civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-authority judicial-discretion mandamus procedural-error sanctions standing three-strikes three-strikes-law three-strikes-statute
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-magistrate-judge-exceeded-authority-in-issuing-strike

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A Congress Enacted The 28§' U.S.€ 19159) Three Strikes StaziséoOf 1996 To Prevent Prisoner's From Filing VEXATIOUS Lawsuits. ; In The Course Federal Judge's May Not Ursupate Curtail; or Abuse This Statute In The Issuance Of Unlawful Or ERRONEOUS STRIKES. The Questions Presented Are: 1. Whether Magistrate NANCY KOENIG Exceeded It's Judicial Authority In Regulation Of A ¢Sanctioning) Strike Which The Fifth Circuit Gourt Of Appeal's Never Issued. 2. Whether Petitioner Is Entitled To Relief Pursuant To 28¢”U.S.C.€1651¢a) To Vacate The Enumeration Of An Unlaw fULiSTRIKE,or Other Issued STRIKES Regarding Appeal #15-407 50 Of The Fifth Circuit's Dismissal,and Enumerated In Civil #5:16-cv-168 As A Third In Prevention From MR.WALLACE Appealing The Merits Of The Ruling. (i)

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-01-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2020)

Attorneys

John Wallace
John Wallace — Petitioner
John Wallace — Petitioner