No. 20-5755

Joseph Lee Jones v. Google LLC

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights consumer-protection due-process first-amendment free-speech human-rights in-forma-pauperis legal-remedies three-strikes
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the three strikes provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) violates the right of access to courts, as it is part of the right of petition protected by the First Amendment and the right to due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

List oF all partiesss ae Proceding inthe Coutt whose Sudgement 15 phe SW ject of this petition 15 a5 follows: Related Cases (cee SHAwpeolounty Distt (+Cowrt Topeka 3 Case reac Vb 9 Gee AS. Wishtict Coudt Topeka Case Gja0-3072-SAC) (See JO ciacut CometoF oppo’ haved 0 ~3087Z) (See US supreme Coun Case A5657) WW ~SOSG(See ULS, Districd Couto toyaks CG se. S 0-037 SAC SY 0€-03/77~LeT Tal le oF Confen4s opinions Belov — Swewicton | , cons aho e SAS SEERA OT dE Gh Niro OT ease Concloston TWX to dyventyes heowhox Pt Exhih Its , i Bo , Li CC LI OL \\ 7 | + ABLE of Author hes. ciel. we ouncil oF Enkove ase ume ms E-MET (201b Job ter3 Final FP Rehcle 1 oF fhe CHK Launctlob Et mayrd[F 1 OSes St ftnesand ales | Q. ‘a 4 ust sll) Kile |G EUS, ASIC ‘ Arle 1¢ ) Pe IT One] Funegtict] othe — ag WC BSI pringer , nic fee a Humane Riahts fee han waa eleaul SuebhictoA— Ca For cases Lrg hederal Coupes; pf v which Hew Slur} 9 nepocecdenw : e Was 2 a ef ~202D LT pa petiofin For Reheapiner was Hab hiy Jf Li] Adimoly petthrnwas donlde Appealson fsllovy hes t | ANdacopy oF the ofan Aypeadin_ LC JAtxdension oP Mime tof] Jo The Tueisdicton of thy S Court is Iv\aked ipabe LE US ASH)) STATE Ment oF the ase erate Sectorg actors (ie. Google ) have A Ethicalduk, +o Adherence ts open Sonrce/open access 4,1 , developement hot Just th America but internat yonalt jelly he Closing oF Google plus and Mi ones? URL www, yp and tS Continued pro hiting From mkdwes DATA, loy requiring 4 EEE Colkbyafy® USCKS to Connect te osyeh Tones##427 04] Relotics Neve lypemen/ plat Form by Google t toolsandapes., Wwithon fp Cortract ot paypary ere k led onthe Google term so} Sten Courep 7 Metre Ruled 0 The 005¢ Term Sot Soaice_ ceauiri ee i bring Libeah on ONLY iw saith Clam Fedral np bwhicd would KeQuiRe in Forma joao ane _ So Le this way Gow b has blocked effective Ramed, ELaw tdddhes hej foal ebb bene Peles ed Aud there Fore The Goole hers oF Use Violate The _ Kirst foren dhwcen Fok twlashtah yn and other Ineerap weal human Mo4%g Thad ieloult bi : j at pole at |S NAS higaese At clalLy fel pace Aacte |+5 vet wide Connected § erVO/CS Niyeh B lack. loox Soc} ely Algor thin & hae The JOoWG to dglete and lolock iwFormatran om te ke Nes Wl, onl is « independ Free larch AL Rosearchge apd. tac fal math Sevcloair witha Neue man phic. computiycmnade|| constitutional Awd STATUTORY yoporlsjon sirolccl | cc pA) He kansag lonsumepe Arolect act S®-ba3 ef, fo boring Cases IW Shawnee Coty districtCouy _ ciCouet Tyotha, K First Amendount oF the wits fate vO Freedom oF CK 5pression) though / Kelyz/ou abot esc) ye @) aia and faethe TELpPR OH) Article Kaa 4 otto L a) awl I$6F LRHK CCF | Slee AcCESSNow. OK ) Human Rights inthe AGE oF AL, NO vember AD lk G26 W9Li7lAS4 2) Ge Rl propAuAcoC rtd red ucsd1 On a Rinle 1G hyepon From AS, Wishicé Cay > OW ule OQ Review ow Cell ty pare / @, Wile WW. ag usCal 0] (e) a [L mo Atede dete Mita 0 TF iv Fore yaayaeCl > Reasons For GlCAwhing the () The Trans king pryect oF the_ E wrapean Coucil have Funded these Adults oF Open Acless ; mle heaifryra,( oseayel, gad Its my Daly fe EFechiel, Shape ard C0 Choate. this Sukh ay O17 Goole frerms 0 PSexnc ee) Was a laa, speitreally treinahlli ky To lot ng legal Ac#RnS , by ALL And ites Whom AKL protected Citizen 5 yew AGIOS, C3), Thave Asked Hewes Genera Lerche) oF Kansas, attention the lon Sumex Prokifro, Vision te given Amlus Catebrie * and Mediate my KGPA,Clims Gad they Say they ane Kh my Lawytle amd Vow hd their Job te ew Fore the KCHA,) | ONC lus lon where Fore Pil.cFnes has Ho EA pte Korey oF Lees Supe cout? Shout gran} Cott andloleeo Review oe What evec. fsavalloe The pettt on for we to CEKti ong Respect Fa le Su lone loy Jo sepn LeeJnes Vatei!O 7] 5-20

Docket Entries

2020-10-19
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent Google, LLC, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)

Attorneys

Google, LLC, Inc.
Barbara Anne SmithBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent
Barbara Anne SmithBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent
Joseph Jones
Joseph Lee Jones — Petitioner
Joseph Lee Jones — Petitioner