| 25-710 |
Erin Uciechowski v. DEA Products, Inc. |
Pennsylvania |
2025-12-18 |
Pending |
|
appellate-procedure due-process legal-review pennsylvania-law petition-for-appeal supreme-court |
1. Whether the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania erred in denying the Petitioner's Petition for Allowance of Appeal?
2. Whether the Pennsylvania appellat… |
| 25A701 |
Beatrice Rivera, aka Beatrice Adams v. Arlington County Department of Human Services |
Virginia |
2025-12-16 |
Application |
|
certiorari petition-for-appeal pro-se state-court-order supreme-court-rules time-extension |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7721 |
William Whittman v. Prime Autotech, Inc., et al. |
Virginia |
2023-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal civil-procedure due-process equal-justice equal-protection federal-questions petition-for-appeal reversible-error state-court state-court-decision |
Does the State Court Decision to deny Petitioner's Petition for Appeal on 2/27/23 on grounds that no reversible error occurred in the lower court viol… |
| 22-7722 |
Félix Vega-La Torres v. United States |
First Circuit |
2023-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ancestry constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing Does the State Court Decision to deny Petitioner's due-process economic-status equal-justice equal-protection
22-7721" ethnicity federal-prosecution federal-questions guidelines-interpretation judicial-bias national-origin petition-for-appeal puerto-rico-defendants race reversible-error sentencing-discrimination state-court-decision |
Does a federal judge's increased sentence targeting a Puerto Rico defendant for higher punishment violate constitutional, statutory, and guidelines pr… |
| 19-320 |
Harold Wade, et ux. v. Kreisler Law, P.C. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-09-10 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure claim-processing federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure functional-equivalence jurisdiction jurisdictional-rules mandatory-claim-processing-rules notice-of-appeal petition-for-appeal petition-for-permission-to-appeal |
whether the 'functional equivalence' doctrine applies to nonjurisdictional mandatory claim processing rules requiring a petition for permission to app… |
| 18-9569 |
Joel Marvin Munt v. Tom Roy, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-06-07 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process judicial-recusal petition-for-appeal plra pro-se-litigation recusal standing three-strikes tro |
Can denial of a Rule 5 Petition for Permission to Appeal be a strike under the PLRA? |