No. 22-7721

William Whittman v. Prime Autotech, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2023-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal civil-procedure due-process equal-justice equal-protection federal-questions petition-for-appeal reversible-error state-court state-court-decision
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the State Court Decision to deny Petitioner's Petition for Appeal on 2/27/23 on grounds that no reversible error occurred in the lower court violate important federal questions of DUE PROCESS and EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a i> ‘Does the State Court Decision to deny Petitioner’s Petition for Appeal on 2/27/23 on grounds that no reversible error occurred in the lower court violate important federal questions of DUE PROCESS and EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW, in a way that : conflicts with both the decision of the state court and of United | States Court of Appeals. . 2. Does the decision to deny the Petition for Appeal adversely affect our legal system, with regard to violations and abuses form the Bench of unrepresented parties’ rights to equal justice and Due Process. : ; 8. Does a decision by this court review of this case serve in the , furtherance of justice. | ia Fa ss 2 | ee a

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent Prime Autotech, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Prime Autotech, Inc., et al.
Terry C. LegumLegumFitzpatrick, PLC, Respondent
William Whittman
William Whittman — Petitioner