Whether the PLRA's 'three strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which bars prisoners from proceeding in forma pauperis if they have had three prior dismissals, violates due process

No question identified. : | QUESTIONG) PRESENTED | | . < dhidkos pb oY obese or ywcteieorecess ts Batbmount to madGousness” toot the PLR, B USCS ECA), whore Lis : POMS € wrtlool, a ON.EL70/N cous easver % © wh Le on , Po ° V4 © A very @ factsoner cogilond Yorn, wore Lo Lee’ , 7% or WA chm 2° peek he brbadortb on0/vs over oF boy niet tb manjoulade, et, anyove on Hares either Hhe Merbnibrts on the court? . ae ; as * Vhehen hee MeL eourt may aby eon gyotieston 4 Proceed” i) Ybime peypers ercker he PLR, ba ‘neverwheleas Mreck he gerbe oor gynctbte hesl ; : XS dhedher he ActhieL court maby Arpose 0 stbike encbr Ake PLRA yoo wrnoge wes 64 » bine » Pagocr’s wtbfes wonder the PLA? . Vo Whether he Abicl cour: conckstos that Fe ot § ggoc0 was aot. ¥ kor “a > 9000 Veith on Ie Senial oY J hei movion her : “eove x Proceed on vorme Peyporis on gocel « cone. be ohelhnged/ on ences J, keke Le. Mile sé) SK: AO Cov. /? elominglon convict SL wth. reevenl c ersvons ov Gis Cool O