| 20-7719 |
Robert L. Tatum v. Thomas Trettin, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-04-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-law due-process free-speech in-forma-pauperis prison-litigation prisoner-litigation-reform-act standing three-strikes-rule |
Whether the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) 3-strike rule is unconstitutional |
| 19-6879 |
Salim Abdul-Malik v. City Government Office of Court Administration, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-accessibility due-process immigration-procedures judicial-reform pleading-standards prisoner-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation state-action |
What is the proper treatment of pro se litigants in the federal court system to ensure their constitutional and judicially-recognized rights to a fair… |
| 18-7006 |
Gordon C. Reid v. Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis plra prisoner-litigation-reform-act standing three-strikes |
Whether the PLRA's 'three strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which bars prisoners from proceeding in forma pauperis if they have had three prior… |