No. 21-7744
Bralen Lamar Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-1915 civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction imminent-danger judicial-review standing three-strikes
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'imminent danger' exception to the 'three strikes' rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) applies when the prisoner alleges that something is about to happen or is on the verge of happening, which satisfies the 'imminent danger' requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED What (5 Anminent Nancee fis fo (He Cement ot Sloe 28 usc $1919(9), As To THE SAT Bisk” Factor’, Meaning Sontetiii ne” Gone To Hafler oR Something 15 About fo Hatten!” \Nhsch Seventy Mates 18 USC$1915 (97 Is Wacganted AS A Yafsicial | “TulynY \talation oF BATHE Cause To Waecant *aminend NANCER. Whar 16 tte Element of Tumint Dance2 AS To fie A Lusk Face! OF Imminent Swvcee ? |
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent