Is a prisoner who is found to have three strikes pursuant to 28 USC 1915 entitled to a one-time appeal on the merits of this finding?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i. Is a.prisoner.who is found to have THREE STRIKES pursuant to 28 UCS 1915 entitled to a ONE TIME appeal on the merits of this finding? ~~ NOTICE «4 Petitioner respectfully additionally presents TWO questions/arguments that were CONCEDED by Respondants in prior proceeding No.19-6705 by their FAILURE to argue against them when ordered to do so by this court( See Medelinv. . Dretke (2005) 544 US 660; Clem v Lomeli, 566 F3d 1177 9th Cir. 2009; Tapia v. Wélls 2015 UD Dist Lexis 102836). . 2. Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdicttion to DECIDE an appeal BEFORE graiting/denying an indigent Appellants Rule 24 request for In ‘Forma Pauperis status? : (Confer: Buck v Davis (2017) 137 S. Ct. 759 establishing that the Court of Appeal does not have jurisdiction to proceed with the appeal until it has settled the question of granting/denying a COA). 3. Were Petitioner's appeal for the District Court's dismissal of his ENTIRE complaint for Misjoinder.a FRIVILOUS appeal? (Confer: Neitke v Williams (1989) 490 US 319). NOTICE 2 © . : After this Court ordered a response on these Claims ( Question 2 and 3 ) and Respondant conceded the claims by failure to argue | Pro Bono retained counsels focused ONLY on the 1 claim Respondants addressed. Petitioner sought to address in pro per afterwards but was rejected as being untimely for Reconsideration( See