No. 19-6452

David P. Moran v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-10-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure discovery mandamus pro-se pro-se-litigant records standing subpoena subpoena-enforcement trial-court writ-of-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a writ of mandamus be automatically granted when the defendant has adequately shown an entity violated an earlier subpoena for records?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED oe ce tune wh. Should a writ of mandamus, compelling the Court to issue a subpoena be wee ~ c..) . . automatically granted when the defendant has adequately shown an entity violated oo, an earlier subpoena for tecordsonly?” tes Ee “-.. «= --2° Should’ the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedures 3.361 have a specific ~ "provision added to allow subpoenas to be issued by pro se litigant’s with trial court , oe approval upon adequate showing of the necessity for the record? — — , J i : . ; '

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-27
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)

Attorneys

David P. Moran
David P. Moran — Petitioner
David P. Moran — Petitioner
Florida
Rebecca Rock McGuiganOffice of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Rebecca Rock McGuiganOffice of Florida Attorney General, Respondent