Can a state district judge be removed from a child-custody case for violation-of-due-process-clause, 14th-amendment, when the judge omits exception-28-usc-1654 for pro-se-litigants and commits a mistake-of-law?

No question identified. : z 2 £ \ II. QUESTIONS OF THE CASE U.S. Fort Bend County District Court Judge Kali Morgan refused to be recused or disqualified for violation of due process clause, prejudgment and bias, lying during child custody proceedings, denied hear any motions filled by petitioner, failed to rule, and denied hear a Writ of Habeas Corpus for an Argentine child to be returned to his mother who was primary custodian of the child since birth until! due process was obstructed by Judge Morgan’s Bailiff Jose Falcon and some local law enforcement employees, who committed aggravated perjury to a judge injured and tortured petitioner, tampered evidence. Fort bend County employees also altered court records at district clerk level by changed the court index, adding statements in court dockets, added services and precepts never provided to petitioner, added notices of orders and capias orders never produced or stated by former Judge Cindy Aguirre, and filed false allegations cases against petitioner, all dismissed. These abusive government employee’s actions happened and were committed by government employees under Judge KP George Administration during the past four years. All these are acts of public administrative fraud, against a housewife innocent citizen, all was reported to FBI agents in Houston and to the Argentine government. Petitioner and her child are Argentinean citizens with dual citizens status whose their constitutional and international rights were injured by these U.S. naturals actions, reason for what petitioner is suing Fort Bend County and its employees involved. The Hague Convention established the resolution of a case within 180 days, Judge Morgan took four years of administrative silent and the case is still pende lite. Judge Morgan ignored exceptions for pro se litigants during child custody cases, she denied heard any of petitioner filed motions and she failed to rule on motion requesting a writ of habeas corpus for the child and the return of petitioner’s sole apportion of money to pay a lawyer. The Federal rights exists, and this case is also an issue of clarity of the United States on regard of children retained inland who hold international rights. The fourteenth court of appeals memorandum opinion on April 19", 2023, stated: “... There are no statutory provisions authorizing an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to recuse a judge. See In re Hart, 460 S.W.3d 742, 743 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2015, no pet.)...” 1) Can a state district judge be removed from a child custody case for violation of due process clause 14 Amendment, of petitioner after an interlocutory appeal for recusal was denied, when the judge omits exception 328 U.S.C. § 1654 of pro se litigants, and commits a mistake of law? 2) Does this due process and other mentioned violations committed by a District Judge Kali Morgan which violated both dual citizens petitioner and her child Constitutional and international rights, is a jus cogens? (according to United Nations, report of the international law commission on the work of its fifty-third session responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts) . 3 I.