No. 22-6785
Ian Gage v. Midwestern University
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-system medical-privacy pro-se-litigant standing throop-v-fe-young-co
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Privacy
SocialSecurity Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do litigants under the Americans with Disability Act lose federal protections to medical privacy through a new interpretation of the 1963 Throop v. F.E. Young & Co?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review 1) Do litigants under the Americans with Disability Act lose federal protections to medical privacy through a . new interpretation of the 1963 Throop v. F.E. Young & Co? 2) Are a pro-se litigant’s constitutional rights to due process under the 5th and 14th amendments being limited or not allowed in the federal court system? i
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-07
Petitioner complied with order of March 20, 2023.
2023-03-20
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 10, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-16
Waiver of right of respondent Midwestern University to respond filed.
2023-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Ian Gage
Ian Gage — Petitioner
Midwestern University
Manuel H. Cairo — Midwestern University, Respondent