| 22-451 |
Loper Bright Enterprises, et al. v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (83)Relisted (5) |
administrative-law agency-power chevron-deference federal-observers fishery-management maritime-regulation statutory-construction statutory-interpretation statutory-silence |
1. Whether, under a proper application of Chevron, the MSA implicitly grants NMFS the power to force domestic vessels to pay the salaries of the monit… |
95.5 |
| 21-1448 |
Dustin Jade Wells v. Kathleen A. McCallister |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
asset-liquidation bankruptcy bankruptcy-estate bankruptcy-filing bankruptcy-petition bankruptcy-proceedings debtor-rights homestead-exemption property-interests property-rights |
This Court has long held that "the date when [a
bankruptcy] petition is filed" is the "point of time" at
which "the status and rights of the bankrupt … |
37.5 |
| 22-660 |
Trevor Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (14)Relisted (2) |
affirmative-defense burden-shifting employment-law intent personnel-action retaliation retaliatory-intent sarbanes-oxley whistleblower whistleblower-protection |
Under the burden-shifting framework that governs Sarbanes-Oxley cases, must a whistleblower prove his employer acted with a "retaliatory intent" as pa… |
25.0 |
| 22-498 |
Kristine Kurk v. Los Rios Classified Employees Association, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
civil-rights collective-bargaining compelled-association due-process first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-association public-employment state-statute union-membership |
Does the First Amendment protect a public employee's right to resign union membership at will? |
17.5 |
| 22-212 |
Jonathan Savas, et al. v. California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
associational-rights compelled-speech constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech janus-v-afscme labor-rights speech-rights union-membership waiver |
The Court in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31 held it violates the First Amendment for a state and union to compel employees to subsidize union speech. 138… |
15.0 |
| 22-219 |
Cara O'Callaghan, et al. v. Michael V. Drake, in His Official Capacity as President of the University of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
civil-rights collective-bargaining first-amendment government-worker janus-precedent janus-v-afscme labor-law labor-rights union-dues |
Whether a union can trap a government worker into paying dues for longer than a year under Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018). |
15.0 |
| 22-665 |
Gordon M. Price v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
commercial-speech content-based-restriction first-amendment permit-requirement prior-restraint public-forum |
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia enjoined enforcement of 54 U.S.C. § 100905, which directs the Secretary of the Interior to "requi… |
13.5 |
| 21-1543 |
Jane Doe, aka Beeism v. Jomy Sterling |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (4) |
anonymous-speech civil-procedure first-amendment online-platforms standard-of-review subpoena |
1. What is the proper standard of review to be applied in determining whether a party may obtain a subpoena compelling the identification an anonymous… |
12.0 |
| 22-946 |
Martin Jay Manley v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
borden categorical-approach circuit-split divisibility extreme-recklessness fourth-circuit mathis use-of-force vicar-statute violent-crimes-in-aid-of-racketeering |
1. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred, in conflict
with decisions of other circuits, in holding that for
purposes of applying the categorical approach t… |
8.5 |
| 22-578 |
Richard Behar v. Department of Homeland Security |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
agency-records appellate-procedure confidentiality foia-exemption-7c freedom-of-information-act party-presentation-principle presidential-administration privacy-interests statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether documents obtained and used by a federal agency in the legitimate conduct of its official duties are not "agency records" and thus never su… |
7.5 |
| 22-595 |
Alexis Fernando Barradas-Jacome v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
None |
|
7.5 |
| 22-519 |
Shawn Rogers Malloy v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
|
attorney-client-privilege brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-remedy due-process prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-v-nobles |
1. Does the prosecution's retention of, failure to
quarantine, and failure to disclose possession of a
criminal defendant's legal strategy notes, pr… |
5.5 |
| 22-752 |
Bi Rite Auto Transport, Inc., et al. v. Russell Dilday, et al. |
California |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment appeal appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment procedural-due-process standing state-court-rules state-law |
1. Is California's scheme of procedural due process in its Code of Civil Procedure and Civil Rules of Court satisfactory of constitutionally protected… |
5.5 |
| 22-788 |
Paul Edwards v. McMillen Capital, LLC |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
amendment breach-of-contract breach-of-implied-covenant court-of-appeals cutpa implied-covenant negligence nied statute-of-limitations tila |
Did The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rule contrary to and in conflict with prior holdings of The Supreme Court of The United States, The Co… |
5.5 |
| 22-792 |
Sergei Vinkov v. Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, et al. |
California |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights defamation due-process first-amendment free-speech religious-speech standing |
(1) Does California Supreme Court create unconstitutional burden on Petitioner's rights abstaining from compelling the state trial court to enter the … |
5.5 |
| 22-793 |
Paul Donald Davis, et al. v. Paul Waller, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
circuit-split civil-rights deadly-force due-process hostage law-enforcement non-suspect-seizure qualified-immunity seizure use-of-force |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit misapplied the test for the constitutional use of deadly force set forth by this Court in Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1… |
5.5 |
| 22-812 |
Isaac D. Koch v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal protection-order standing statutory-interpretation |
What is the government's interpretation of an order against all contact and communication and presence?
If the Court agrees that the power of the peo… |
5.5 |
| 22M100 |
Angel Marie Jordan v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M101 |
Patricia Hermann v. Detective Jonathan B. McFarland, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22-951 |
Jane Doe No. 1, et al. v. Todd Rokita, Attorney General of Indiana, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-law dobbs-precedent dobbs-v-jackson first-amendment free-exercise free-speech medical-protocols religious-beliefs |
Whether, following Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022), this Court's First Amendment precedents continue to apply to … |
4.5 |
| 22-5877 |
Onterrail Remond Altman, Jr. v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
categorical-approach circuit-split controlled-substances criminal-sentencing decontrolled-substances drug-convictions eighth-circuit federal-sentencing prior-convictions sentencing-enhancement |
Whether prior drug convictions inclusive of substances that have since been decontrolled can be used to impose present day federal sentencing enhancem… |
4.0 |
| 22-6001 |
Medgar Samuel v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
antiterrorism-act antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act circuit-split district-court federal-courts federal-statute habeas-corpus procedural-default state-courts |
Whether, after enactment of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3) as part of the
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a State can forfeit the
affir… |
4.0 |
| 22-626 |
Hazem M. Hamdan, et al. v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, et al. |
Minnesota |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process fiduciary-duty informed-consent medicaid-regulations medical-ethics medicare-medicaid patient-rights |
Are complainants to the Minnesota Board of Dentistry (the Board) entitled to the statutory due process as plainly stated in 45 CFR § 164.508, and MN S… |
4.0 |
| 22-670 |
Pacesetter Consulting, LLC v. Herbert A. Kapreilian, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arizona-law civil-procedure damages damages-rule federal-courts federal-procedure service-of-process special-appearance statute-of-limitations waiver-doctrine |
Special appearance. In federal courts, "special
appearances" no longer exist—and have not for many
decades. But lawyers file them every day and distri… |
3.5 |
| 22-780 |
Scott Meide, et al. v. Noah Centineo, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review brief-requirements civil-rights court-obligations due-process judicial-discretion judicial-independence judicial-procedure judicial-review legal-standards rule-of-law separation-of-powers |
1. Do we have a government of laws and not of men?
2. Must a deciding panel in a court of appeals address all of the issues raised in the opening bri… |
3.5 |
| 22-810 |
Andrea Liebman v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction automatic-stay bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review pro-tunc-order standing willful-violation |
Did the 11th U.S. Court Of Appeals err when the 3 Judge Panel & 12 Judge En Banc Panel Per Curiam issued the 11-2-21 Opinion Affirming the Bankruptcy … |
3.5 |
| 22-811 |
John E. Reardon v. New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-U.S.C.-§1983 42-usc-1983 absolute-immunity civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-violations constitutional-rights due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct jurisdictional-challenge standing |
Are Judges Liable for Equity, Prospective and/or Legal relief when they
Usurped, Lacked, or Lost their Jurisdiction, Discretion or Violated Common, Ca… |
3.5 |
| 22-832 |
Michael A. Caldwell, et al. v. Joseph M. Gasper, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director, Michigan State Police, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1981 civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination diversity-initiative employment employment-discrimination gender-preference protected-activity race-preference title-vii |
Whether opposition to an employer's "Diversity Initiative" (non-remedial race and gender preferences) constitutes protected activity under 42 USC § 19… |
3.5 |
| 22-833 |
John E. Reardon v. Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-mandate due-process equity-relief judicial-immunity jurisdictional-defect legal-recourse mandamus ministerial-acts standing |
Given this Court's Mandate found in Wong Kim Ark v U.S., 169 U.S. 649, 654, 1898 that all Courts must consider the Common Law in its decisions and Pay… |
3.5 |
| 22-837 |
Charles Clark, III, et al. v. Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
capable-of-repetition constitutional-claims evading-review government-defendant government-defendants inter-circuit-conflict judicial-review mootness voluntary-cessation |
Courts have struggled with mootness—a problem intensified recently with governments' hefty issuances of recurrent orders. Improper dismissal of a case… |
3.5 |
| 22-847 |
Virginia Silva-Navarro v. Roosevelt REO PR Corporation |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction due-process executive-power federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts foreign-entity-litigation jurisdiction precedent standing supreme-court-precedent tax-collection |
1. Are lower courts in the federal system to follow the case law of this Honorable Court? Or, the case law of this Honorable Court is merely persuasiv… |
3.5 |
| 22-862 |
Brooklyn Zavion Johnson v. West Virginia |
West Virginia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment 5th-amendment consent-to-search due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment juvenile-rights probable-cause search-and-seizure warrantless-entry warrantless-search |
Whether Petitioner's 4th amendment right against unreasonable search was violated where police made warrantless entry into his hotel on the basis that… |
3.5 |
| 22-878 |
Alexander V. Brown v. William Harrington, United States Trustee for Region 1 |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
28-usc-1930 bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-fees chapter-11 constitutional-challenge equal-protection reopened-case reopening retroactivity statutory-interpretation united-states-trustee |
1. Whether 28 U.S.C. §1930(a)(6)(A) applies to a case
under Chapter 11 of Title 11, United States Code, upon
reopening, where the chapter 11 case was … |
3.5 |
| 22-883 |
Rachel Evens v. David Gilbertson, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-rights diversity-jurisdiction due-process judicial-immunity standing state-court-proceedings subject-matter-jurisdiction younger-abstention |
1: What constitutes "acts in excess of jurisdiction" versus "the clear absence of subject-matter jurisdiction", with the judges being subject to civil… |
3.5 |
| 22-895 |
Murphy Creek, LLC, et al. v. Murphy Creek Metropolitan District No. 3 |
Colorado |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 attorneys-fees civil-rights common-nucleus common-nucleus-of-operative-fact judicial-relief prevailing-party section-1983 substantial-claim substantiality |
1. Whether the Colorado Courts ignored the intent of Congress set forth in 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 and binding precedents of this Court, and erred in holdi… |
3.5 |
| 22-900 |
Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola v. Robert Allen Brundage |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction procedural-fairness standing sua-sponte subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether a District Court can nullify an existing diversity jurisdiction by doing sua sponte conversion of one of Plaintiff's two witnesses into Plain… |
3.5 |
| 22-907 |
Monte Silver, Ltd. v. Internal Revenue Service, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing compliance-costs procedural-violation regulatory-flexibility-act small-business-rights tax-cuts-and-jobs-act transition-tax |
This case presents an important question as to the proper application of Article III standing to small businesses who challenge regulations under the … |
3.5 |
| 22-940 |
Sheldon Schwartz v. Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law bill-of-rights due-process liberty-right medical-license medical-licensing professional-practice professional-regulation rational-basis state-board |
"The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates and renders applicable to the States Bill of Rights protections "fundamental to our scheme… |
3.5 |
| 22-6182 |
Stacy L. Conner v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-discretion liberty-interest procedural-fairness standing statutory-interpretation |
1.) An important Question in the Administration of Justice, which has the potential to effect a large number of american citizens, is: "Does the U.S. … |
-4.0 |
| 22-6215 |
Brenda Davis v. Mallards Landing Associates LTD, dba Mission Pointe Apartments |
Florida |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights court-procedure due-process health-and-safety health-welfare housing housing-safety judicial-review mold motion-denial rehearing rehearing-standards |
REVIEW POINT I: Whether Petitioner 's Health, Safety and Welfare were
protected and attentive while living in unsafe housings particular contaminated
… |
-4.0 |
| 22-6287 |
Ashley Y. (Yoo Hyang) Kim v. Public Schools of Brookline, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-law discrimination due-process employment fourth-amendment legal-representation privacy-rights school-search student-surveillance termination |
I, Ashley Y. (Y Hyang) KIM, the Pro Se Petitioner, never have been informed numerous times, it is the right route, when nobody at Brookline HIGH SCHOO… |
-4.0 |
| 22-6629 |
Keith Edmund Gavin v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
aedpa aedpa-deference federal-constitutional-claim habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance state-court-decision state-court-review state-law-evidentiary-rule strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (""AEDPA")
provides that habeas relief "shall not be granted with respect to any claim that … |
-4.5 |
| 22-6831 |
Will Lee Carter v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment freedom-of-religion self-incrimination sexually-violent-predator substantive-due-process |
This Court has ruled that a variation of mental commitment known in several states as a "sexually violent predator" commitment proceeding can be const… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6832 |
James L. Mahaffey v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
cell-phones criminal-procedure digital-evidence fourth-amendment privacy search-and-seizure |
"The Petitioner respectfully ask "'- When the [Fjramers of the Oklahoma State Constitution, created and enacted Article I. $ 3\ [Unappropriated public… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6840 |
David Omar Caraballo v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review case-review civil-procedure court-decision due-process harmless-error judicial-procedure legal-interpretation legal-review petitioner-claims standard-of-review standing |
WIHETHER THE INSTANT
STATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
AS PRESENTED ON DIRET APPEAL. |
-4.5 |
| 22-6850 |
Raul Mendez v. Community Health Clinics, Inc., dba Terry Reilly Health Services |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure discovery-sanction dismissal-sanction due-process finality-rule judicial-discretion res-judicata sanctions usurpation-of-judicial-power writ-of-certiorari |
1) Is a dismissal sanction a decision on the legal merits of the case? And does res judicata and the finality rule apply to cases dismissed as a disco… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6857 |
Cynthia J. Rowe v. Penny J. Roberts, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights crime-scene criminal-procedure defendant-presence documentary-evidence due-process equal-protection evidentiary-standard jurisdiction standing supreme-court-review |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 22-6859 |
Eddie Turner v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al. |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
affirmative-defense civil-procedure claim-preclusion deed-of-trust demurrer final-judgment judicial-ruling operation-of-law privity void-deed void-deed-of-trust |
A void deed of trust is without legal effect. It binds no one and is a mere nullity. Such a contract has no existence whatsoever. It has no legal enti… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6861 |
Jairo Francisco Solano v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment appellate-review confrontation-clause criminal-procedure defendant-objection due-process evidence evidence-admission hearsay judicial-procedure trial-court-error |
DID THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY ADMITTING HEARSAY TESTIMONY OVER THE OBJECTION OF MR. SOLANO?
WAS THIS EVIDENCE ADMITTED IN VIOLATION OF THE CONFRONTATI… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6868 |
Billy Leon Kearse v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
counsel-performance due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-strategy sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's analysis of ineffective assistance of counsel claims fails to protect the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6875 |
Yvonne Jiang v. Helen Xu, et al. |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-power civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-conspiracy judicial-misconduct vexatious-litigant |
1. California Constitution and its Rules of Court confer too much power to its Chief Justice that when the Chief Justice conspires with the people who… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6876 |
Haroun Bacchus v. Misty Thomson, et al. |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment fraud-allegations litigation-process procedural-due-process standing united-states-constitution |
Whether the civil procedures performed in both cases violate the requirements of procedural due process of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United Stat… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6882 |
David Byron Russ v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-defendant capital-punishment criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus mental-competency review-claim state-court state-courts substantive-incompetency |
1. Whether a state court may refuse to review a capital defendant's claim of substantive incompetency? |
-4.5 |
| 22-6884 |
Pradheep Chhalliyil v. Foodchain ID Group, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination employment employment-discrimination evidence evidence-gathering national-origin-discrimination prima-facie-case termination title-vii |
1: Does Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 & 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) prohibit discrimination as to all "terms, conditions, or privileges of e… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6887 |
Steve Audette v. United States, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
11th-amendment civil-rights federal-jurisdiction prospective-relief sovereign-immunity standing |
Sleven Audett, had an active, on tine, nonfuirleres, ptogesseng Janagan, in the U.S djdited the Hoable u Soie Case5:17-CTH2 Distid, Easten Distict of … |
-4.5 |
| 22-6888 |
Samantha D. Rajapakse v. Seyfarth Shaw, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights credit-reporting credit-reporting-agency due-process fair-credit-reporting-act first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigation standing |
Question#1: Can a law firm retained by any credit reporting agency carry out the duties of and services of credit reporting agency business?
Question… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6890 |
Samantha Delane Rajapakse v. Equifax Information, LLC |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights computer-fraud-abuse-act constitution constitutional-rights credit-reporting due-process fair-credit-reporting-act judicial-review standing |
This is a three-part question a judiciary review regarding how the courts review individuals without counsel on The Fair Credit Reporting Act. authori… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6891 |
Joseph Dingler v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment free-speech indigent-defendant post-conviction-relief standing takings trial-transcript voting |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 22-6896 |
Kim Lynn Mason v. Jim Farris, Warden |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process habeas-corpus judicial-relief jurisdiction state-prisoner void-judgment |
Whether due process demands that corrective judicial process in the nature of state writ of habeas corpus be available to expunge a void judgment for … |
-4.5 |
| 22-6898 |
John L. Love v. Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion constitutional-error discretionary-review due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct relation-back strickland-standard unreasonable-application |
1. Did the District court abuse its discretion under "unreasonable application" when petitioner Love's proposed amendment did "relate back" to the ori… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6903 |
William Landry, Jr. v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights due-process faretta-v-california fourteenth-amendment indigent-defense sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-constitution statutory-interpretation |
"The Petitioner respectfully ask '* When the [Fjramers of the Oklahoma State Constitution, created and enacted Article I. £ 3. [Unappropriatedpublic l… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6904 |
Robert Roderick Stubblefield v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals civil-rights court-of-appeals district-court due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-merits petition-review standing writ-of-certiorari |
Should a C 0 A have; b e e n issued and should' relief have been
given after revieu) of the merits of all three claims that
raised to the District c… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6907 |
Jeremy Jermaine Cumbie v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-unusual-punishment due-process evidence evidence-outside-record outside-the-record record sentencing trial-court-discretion |
I. WAS MR. CUMBIE DENIED DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW WHEN THE COURT CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE RECORD IN ASSESSING THE SENTENCE?
II. DID THE TRIAL CO… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6911 |
In Re Bradley M. Cunningham |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-defendant due-process extraordinary-circumstances pretrial-detainee standing state-law void-judgment |
Is the Petitioner entitled to benefit from existing state law and state
supreme court decisions that all clearly provide for a finding of VOID JUDGME… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6917 |
Stevie Andre Roberson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment due-process equal-protection false-information liberty-interest parole parole-board procedural-rights texas-parole-statute |
(1) WHETHER THE MANDATORY PARDON STRUCTURE OF TEXAS PAROLE STATUTE ARTICLE 45.15 § 15 (?) TOGETHER WITH THE REQUISITE AND SPECIAL PAROLE CONDITIONS OF… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6918 |
Ralph Hall v. Darwin LeClaire, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment administrative-law agency-decision appellate-review civil-rights contempt counsel due-process incarceration judicial-review procedural-due-process statutory-interpretation |
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND SENTENCE REVIEW OF PRO-SE PLEADINGS WERE SELECTIVE RATHER THAN THE REQUIR… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6920 |
Ogerta Helena Hartwein v. Missouri |
Missouri |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights confrontation-clause criminal-procedure custody domestic-violence due-process forfeiture forfeiture-by-wrongdoing intent witness-testimony |
Pre. urstodys, Somedute sheuated on We 20\& order,
The Gimina® Ur Way aod Noring tap Wer Son ¥o
Fates on Quar lb) old, per The 2OIA order
The, Missour… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6922 |
Samuel Ross v. Clerk of Courts of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights civil-rights-action extraordinary-circumstance fed-r-civ-p-60(b)(6) lewis-v-casey prisoner-rights rule-60(b)(6) |
Whether the majority Circuit Court of Appeal decisions clarifying that Lewis v. Casey does not foreclose a prisoner's right to access to courts to lit… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6929 |
Forrest Thomas III v. Brandon M. Smith, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-disparity sex-offender-registration |
Whether a sex offender registry statute, when applied to predators convicted of rape without any sexual motivation to the offense, bears a reasonable … |
-4.5 |
| 22-6483 |
Eli Sloan v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure impartial-jury jury-selection prejudicial sixth-amendment trial-procedure voir-dire |
1. Whether the voir dire selection was partial or prejudicial in violation of Petitioner. Eli Sloan's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. |
-6.0 |
| 22-6498 |
Joseph T. Shine-Johnson v. David W. Gray, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
agency counsel-appointment discretionary-review due-process federal-appellate-review habeas-corpus indigent-counsel sixth-amendment state-government |
1. Whether due process extends to the State government opting to assign an indigent petitioner appointed counsel on discretionary Review and if due pr… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6668 |
Aaron Lyons v. Brian Ladner, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights criminal-procedure dna-evidence due-process evidence fifth-circuit ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel insufficient-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct standing |
1. Petitionee has presented that key state witness 10:45 using cellphone while testifying against petitioner at trial. Petitioner was convicted solely… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6785 |
Ian Gage v. Midwestern University |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-system medical-privacy pro-se-litigant standing throop-v-fe-young-co |
1) Do litigants under the Americans with Disability Act lose federal protections to medical privacy through a new interpretation of the 1963 Throop v.… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6871 |
Ahmed Khalil v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing speedy-trial |
I' Ktd Ti-cp&flc 7«e^ i*<&eQJK fitfi'TiVnif-U)ke*-e -fie pYaSsCvT^r osA«u w-
\ahtti tLcr wVTW Wooy <W c^i^<s (xwa/,yer dlibyij
'f'L) cuzfioa J
kofru#… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6899 |
Rosalyn McDonald-Henry v. Dale S. Brink, et al. |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process experimental-procedure informed-consent medical-ethics medical-procedures medical-teaching newman-v-spellberg patient-rights standing substantive-due-process teaching-subject |
1. Whether the substantive Due Process Clause subsumes a constitutionally protected right to refuse experimental medical procedures by a physician in … |
-6.5 |
| 22-6906 |
Joseph Johnson v. Casey Campbell, Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation counsel due-process habeas-corpus judicial-prejudice legal-standard lower-court-error petition-review standing summary-judgment |
1. Did the lower court err in granting Correctional Defendants' motion to dismiss?
2. Did the lower court err in granting Defendant Wexford's motion … |
-6.5 |
| 22-6919 |
In Re DeAnn Graham |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-rights clear-error due-process fair-housing justiciability mandamus |
When this case was before the Court of Appeals on the Appeals" and "review[ed] the Plaintiffs' appeals challenging the District Court's Judge Jon E. D… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6937 |
Robert L. Davis v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 28-usc-1915 access-to-courts civil-rights court-access cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment first-amendment pro-se-litigant redress |
Question & oue
PoC. S A L't F-e-f-i'vne. 8 Cl vi TO CO Ur 4s LivtUcr IS? U-S. C,
%ltis(9) U^kss Owe. Pco/5 In- FTU Due. Process
V?oIcttimg Tke. 1st Av… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6954 |
Juanita Burch v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, L.L.C. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bankruptcy-court bankruptcy-procedure bankruptcy-removal civil-procedure court-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction lien-extinguishment loan-management procedural-error removal summary-judgment |
The defendant, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (Rushmore) lost a hearing in the state court because they did not have a loan on the property an… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6957 |
Toni Marie Davis v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bodily-autonomy civil-rights consent constitutional-rights due-process government-overreach medical-ethics nuremberg-codes vaccine-mandate voluntary-consent |
Did the President including the federal government violate the Constitution and other federal and state laws by mandating an experimental vaccine? Nur… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6974 |
Theodore Smith v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights collateral-consequences criminal-procedure due-process sex-offender-registration |
i) OA A comxx^ fc o:teDl^ 16
\>&M ^ ^ fa 0fW _ . ^h'J' U-5
<^>[(Aisrji\ r§Vi^uD tx ST^lg
T»w^ b>ojr.
£ea/l a stag b<? gAtussii Ff^/] 1^)1"'
cf cx bam… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6985 |
Lisa Bergman v. Jeremy Howard, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause constitutional-right criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process expert-testimony expert-witness prosecution-evidence right-to-counsel scientific-evidence scientific-expert |
Whether the Due Process Clause requires an impoverished criminal defendant to be appointed a scientific expert that is essential to confront scientifi… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6987 |
Dennis J. Brookshire v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process eyewitness-identification fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel out-of-court-identification post-conviction-review |
WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO MOVE TO SUPRESS THE OUT OF COURT IDENTIFICATIONS AND DID SUCH IDENTIFICATIONS DENY THE PETITIONER A FAIR … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7012 |
Lionel Jericho McCoy v. California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
charging-document common-law common-law-pleading criminal-charging due-process first-degree-murder notice notice-requirements sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment |
Does the 1883 rule set forth in People v. Soto, 63 Cal. 165 (1883) — that facts which expose a defendant to increased punishment need not be charged i… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7085 |
Rodolfo Godinez v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure-miranda due-process fair-trial gang-evidence gang-expert-testimony ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insufficient-evidence media-exposure miranda-rights sixth-amendment |
1. Whether the Appellant's Pre-Miranda Statements was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona., 384 U.S. 436 (1966)?
2. Whether the prosecutor's … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7111 |
Tony Khong v. Scott Frauenheim, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-claim brady-vs-maryland de-novo-review evidence-suppression giglio-vs-united-states habeas-corpus kyles-vs-whitley materiality ninth-circuit united-states-vs-bagley |
Did the Ninth Circuit's de novo disposition of Petitioner's Brady claim in the habeas corpus context, which focused exclusively on Bagley's earlier ru… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7124 |
Ricky Lee Scott v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction |
Arkansas |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-violation due-process first-degree-murder jury-instructions life-imprisonment state-procedural-default trial-error waiver |
WHETHER PETITIONER SCOTT'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW WAS VIOLATED WHEN HE WAS CONVICTED IN A JURY TRIAL OF FIRST-DEGREE MURDER AND SENTENCED TO LIFE… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7133 |
Ryan Stancu v. Southern Methodist University |
Texas |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
breach-of-contract civil-procedure constitutional-provisions discovery discovery-rights due-process jury-trial seventh-amendment |
1. Did the lower courts and the Supreme Court of Texas usurped the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution by wrongly denying Stancu's rig… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7143 |
Xunxian Liu v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law agency-action agency-policy civil-rights due-process employment-rights federal-employment notice performance-improvement performance-improvement-plan procedural-rights |
There are many federal questions, stated Agencies ' violations chronologically as follows:
A. DHHS ' violations
1.5/21/2015. Responsible Management … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7167 |
Quentin Truley v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights crime-of-violence criminal-procedure due-process hobbs-act ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining probable-cause sentencing |
(1) Under categorical approach, is 18 USC § 924(c)'s residual clause held as unconstitutionally vague, and predicated by Conspiracy to Commit Hobbs Ac… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7190 |
Dante R. Voss v. Kevin A. Carr, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection legal-loan-policy standing takings takings-clause |
1. WHETHER Voss's COMPLAINT STATES A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED?
2. WHETHER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD? |
-6.5 |
| 22-7211 |
Marco Antonio Aguilar-Medina v. Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-procedure statute-of-limitations |
1. Fa Mute Coot (ele o208R, eye Rdbowe 4 Ceedbeak of Aypeslabld,, 0a violebos Lf Rl lens etch dhol che PP PCESS ag hts, AS tleded J VE 1k Auucuewt, 4)… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7216 |
Terrell Anderson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment appellate-review criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-circuit judicial-review motion-to-suppress pretrial-motion search-and-seizure standard-of-review |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred when it affirmed the district court's denial of Terrell Anderson's pretrial mo… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7217 |
Antoine Bryant, Sr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
deterrence evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment no-knock-warrant search-and-seizure suppression warrant-requirements |
Whether a no-knock search warrant issued, without any evidence of an exigent circumstance, should result in the evidence being suppressed under the Fo… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7231 |
James Sonny Alaniz v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment gall-standard gall-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-due-process upward-departure |
Whether the Court of Appeals holding that a sentencing court is not required to use the incremental steps in Section 4A1 -3(a)(4)(B) in an upward depa… |
-6.5 |