No. 22-6888

Samantha D. Rajapakse v. Seyfarth Shaw, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights credit-reporting credit-reporting-agency due-process fair-credit-reporting-act first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a law firm retained by a credit reporting agency carry out the duties of and services of credit reporting agency business?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Fair Credit Reporting Act provides authorization to send your credit report to creditors, government authorities, landlords, employers, and others it has reasons to believe intend to use the report for such actions as a credit transaction, insurance coverage, employment purposes, determination of eligibility for government benefits or licenses, or a legitimate business need in connection thereof. Fair Credit Report 1681i allows court orders, subpoenas, for child support and enforcement purposes, potential investors or current insurers of credit porfolios with written instructions from the individual. Petitioner seeking the Supreme Court to , grant her a writ of certiorari for these questions of public interest. Question#1: Can a law firm retained by any credit reporting agency carry out the duties of and services of credit reporting agency business? Question#2: Can a law firm retained by a credit reporting agency deny services of that as a credit reporting agency to any individual without notifying said individual? Question#3: Can a law firm retained by a credit reporting agency make changes to an individual credit reporting history as a punitive measure to force a settlement of a dispute? Question#4: Does the First Amendment of the Constitution of the right to file a greviance to be used in a civil case as a defense? \ ne eet

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2022-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2023)
2022-11-02
Application (22A375) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 30, 2023.
2022-10-29
Application (22A375) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 29, 2022 to January 28, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Samantha D. Rajapakse
Samantha Rajapakse — Petitioner