Whether Oklahoma's State Constitution Article II § 20 violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by failing to contain the language of the Speedy Trial Act

No question identified. : , THE PETITIONER PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING QUESTION(): 1. “The Petitioner respectfully ask”. When the [F/ramers of the Oklahoma State Constitution, created and enacted Article I, § 3, [Unappropriated public lands Indian Lands Jurisdiction of United States, did the State of Oklahoma and/or its Official(s) “forever” disclaim and/or waive jurisdiction within Indian Country? 8 2. “The Petitioner respectfully ask”. [Although the Petitioner is Nativel, is [Rlace a critical element in criminal proceeding(s) within the State of Oklahoma? Or will this destroy a century of justice reform and the abolishment of racism within our Jurisprudence? + 8. “The Petitioner respectfully ask” What Congressional Law/Statute grants Oklahoma “concurrent jurisdiction” within Indian Country, found within the borders of the State of : Oklahoma? ® 4. May any State or Territory create, enact or enforce® any penal statute or constitutional provision in CONTUMACY of the Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial? 5. What is the “time limit” of a Speedy Trial in a State’ criminal proceeding? More so when the state fails to have a time limit for a Speedy Tria. 3 As Congress took care to require Oklahoma to agree and declare that it would forever disclaim all right and title in or to... all lands lying within [the State's] limits owned or held by any Indian, tribe, or nation. 34 Stat. 270. > Quoting the Honorable Neil Gorsuch 4 This question is extremely vital to the Petitioner’s case as he was personally racially discriminated against be the State Judge(s) in this case. The Black Lives Mater Organization has completely deterred the Court(s) from racially discriminating against Americans of color, (black), and the Courts have now turned their racism towards Native American(s). This “critical” element adopted by Oklahoma will subject every citizen to racism for an eternity and/or until this Honorable Court removes the race from the elements and mandates that the Federal Government has sole jurisdiction of Major Crimes Act and the Tribes have sole jurisdiction pursuant to the General Crimes Act. Oklahoma simply has zero jurisdiction within Indian country, regardless of race. 5 This question arises from this Honorable Court's ruling of “Oklahoma ve. Castro-Huerta’ No. 21-429 (April 27, 2022). 6 Violation(s) Article VI, clause 2 and the 14 Amendment 7 This question pertains to all 50 state(s) and all territories of the United States NOT just OKLAHOMA 8 Oklahoma does not have a Penal Statute defining our right to Speedy Trial or its time limit(s). Page 2 of 27 6. The Petitioner is challenging the constitutionality of the State of Oklahoma’s penal statute(s) and constitutional? provision(s) governing the time limits of Speedy Trial, [fromm the filing of information to arraignment and triall, (Title 22, Ch. 11 § 812.1 to 812.17; Title 22, Ch. 1 § 138 and Oklahoma Constitution, Article IT § 20"). 7. The Petitioner is challenging the CONSTITUTIONALITY of the Oklahoma Public Defender’s!, POLICY AND PROCEDURE(s)". ii