Yvonne Jiang v. Helen Xu, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the California Constitution and its Rules of Court confer too much power to the Chief Justice, allowing for abuse of power and conspiracy against litigants
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1. California Constitution and its Rules of Court confer too much power to its Chief Justice that when the Chief Justice conspires with the people who claim under her/him to sabotage a litigant’s claims for the Chief Justice’s personal agenda, : the checked and balance of California Judicial System fails to function. In this 7 case, the former Chief Justice of California Tan G. Cantil-Sakauye conspired with ; every level of justices and judges, courts clerks and Administrative Director who ; all claimed under her, to sabotage claims. The Chief Justice alone denied Appellant's petition for review to the California Supreme Court ‘ despite that the Chief Justice was asked to recuse herself. No reason was given for the denial. The defendants who forged document in the court and made false declaration under oath awarded judgments and attorney fees against the and the Appellant/Plaintiff was found a vexatious litigant who oe was prohibited to file any new lawsuit in any court in the State of California. Such results directly challenge the Constitution of the United States regarding the equal rights, equal protection, and free from persecution that protect the United States citizens. The results also provoke the United States Codes Title 18 : (a) : Conspiracy against rights, 18 USC 241; (b) Power of Court 18 USC 401; (c) Contempt(s) constituting crimes, 18 USC 402; (d) Perjury, 18 USC 1621; (e) Subornation of perjury, 18 USC 1622; (f) False declaration before grand jury or court, 18 USC 1623. ; 2. The exercise of the supervisory power of the United States Supreme Court is absolutely needed: To protect the equal right for justice and free from legal persecution, to protect her from suffering legal persecution led by ; the former California Chief Justice Tani G: Cantil-Sakauye, to protect the her from suffering discrimination based on her financial status, that was caused by __ the courts Administrator and employees of the California courts system. 3. All the power and privilege that conferred on the justices and judges, who ; : participated in the persecution of the Appellant/Plaintiff and participated in the : Chief Justice’s conspiracy, and who abused their power and intentionally made ruling against the laws, shall be rescinded instantly when they acted on the persecution and on the conspiracy. Their conspiracy and intentional disregarding the laws constitute contempt of the court and contempt of the Constitution which ) disqualified them from continue representing the courts. 4. Every order, judgment, and ruling including the Prefiling Order against the Appellant/Plaintiff that was issued by these justices and judges, that violated the laws of California and the Constitution; is the resulting product of the conspiracy, . persecution, discrimination, and contempt; shall be revoked. _5. Every person in the California courts system, who knowingly has participated in the conspiracy and participated in the persecution and discrimination against the Appellant/Plaintiff is culpable and liable to Appellant's damages. They all shall be prosecuted in the court of laws to uphold the laws. ; . iN .