Samantha Delane Rajapakse v. Equifax Information, LLC
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Can the Eleventh Circuit have a Constitutional right to misinterpret or arrive a new interpretation of due process of the United States Constitution?
QUESTION PRESENTED : This is a three-part question a judiciary review regarding how the courts review individuals without counsel on The . Fair Credit Reporting Act. authorization to send your credit report to creditors, government authorities, landlords, employers, and others it has reasons to believe intend to use the . report for such actions as a credit transaction, insurance coverage, employment purposes, determination of eligibility for government benefits or licenses, or a legitimate business need in connection thereof. Fair Credit Report $/68/i allows court orders, subpoenas, for child support and enforcement purposes, potential investors or current insurers of credit porfolios with written instructions from the individual. The lower and Circuit Court are under the interpretation of the Supreme Court as to the privacy laws, consumer laws and the United States Constitution. Petitioner seeking the Supreme Court to grant her a writ of certiorari for these questions of public interest. Question#1: Can the Eleventh Circuit have a Constitutional _ right to misinterpret or arrive a new interpretation of due : process of the United States Constitution? Question#2: Question#3: Can a law firm retained by a credit reporting agency make changes to an individual credit reporting history as a punitive measure to force a settlement of a dispute? Question#4: Does Credit Reporting Agency are immune from the Computer Fraud Abuse Act if a person’s credit reporting account is provided to their Attorney for litigation purposes? 2