Is the Petitioner entitled to benefit from existing state law and state supreme court decisions that all clearly provide for a finding of VOID JUDGMENT based upon undisputed and admitted facts that his civil-rights-were-substantially-violated-without-any-due-process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the Petitioner entitled to benefit from existing state law and state supreme court decisions that all clearly provide for a finding of VOID JUDGMENT based upon undisputed and admitted facts that his civil rights were substantially violated without any Due Process? 2. When the Government substantially violates the civil rights of a criminal defendant (Pretrial Detainee) without Due Process, is the judgment of conviction ; being sought, by law, void? PETITIONER: . BRADLY M. CUNNINGHAM . 10456927. 2605 STATE STREET , SALEM, OR 97310 RESPONDENT: ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Bar No. 753239 : ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF OREGON OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1162 COURT ST,, NE : SALEM, OR 97301 ; ; 503/378-6002 i. BRADLY M. CUNNINGHAM . 10456927 2605 STATE STREET SALEM, OREGON 97310