What is the government's interpretation of an order against all contact and communication and presence?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED What is the government’s interpretation of an order against all contact and communication and presence? If the Court agrees that the power of the people’s government does not extend to stop all contact and communication, has the defendant challenged the order properly? Under what circumstances must a State recognize withdrawal of a plea? Is it not perfectly beneficial to the victim of a crime to profit from the court’s powers of persuasion that the accused — not, is irretrievably and hopelessly reprehensible, but rather that he — is accused of a crime? Will the Court prioritize the peace of any over the peace of the State? Who is the victim, when statute penalizes breaking a protection order, if not the reputation of the Court? Will the Court recognize that the underlying protection order was not issued in accordance with statute? ii PARTIES Isaac D. Koch, petitioner, began as defendant in the County Court of Platte County, Nebraska. In the appeal taken to District Court, he was appellant. In the appeal prosecuted to the Court of Appeals through the Nebraska Supreme Court, he was also appellant. At the time of the incident, he was the defendant in a marriage contract dispute. He continues to prosecute a counterclaim of annulment at this time. The State of Nebraska, respondent, began as plaintiff in County Court. Within the appeals, Nebraska prosecuted her case as appellee. Notable within the interests of the State are both people bringing charges and people present at the incident. Mr. Hart, county attorney, filed the charges, with the report of Deputy : Avila. Key names seen at the incident are Andela Koch, seen as plaintiff in the marriage contract dispute and also as petitioner in the protection order leading to the underlying charges, and Mr. Menendez, a party who telephoned the government’s police. PROCEEDINGS BELOW Supreme Court of the United States, 22A585, Koch v. Nebraska, petition for stay of mandate denied January 3, 2023, App.c. Supreme Court of Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. Koch, petition to stay mandate overruled December 12, 2022, App.d. Supreme Court of Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. . Koch, further review denied November 15, 2022, App.e. Court of Appeals of Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. Koch, motion for rehearing denied, October 17, 2022, App.f. 1 Court of Appeals of Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. Koch, opinion released, September 13, 2022, App.g. District Court of Platte County Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. Koch, motion to reconsider denied February 2, 2022, App.r. District Court of Platte County Nebraska, A-22-84, Nebraska v. Koch, verdict affirmed, January 14, 2022, App.s. ; County Court of Platte County Nebraska, CR-21317, Nebraska v. Koch, sentence, September 29, 2021, App.w. County Court of Platte County Nebraska, CR-21317, Nebraska v. Koch, motion to withdraw plea denied, September 23, 2021, App.x. County Court of Platte County Nebraska, CR-21317, Nebraska v. Koch, plea entered, July 19, 2021, App.y. District Court of Platte County, Nebraska, CI-20504, Koch v. Koch, protection order affirmed December 21, 2020, App.z. S District Court of Platte County, Nebraska, CI-20504, Koch v. Koch, protection order entered December 10, 2020, App.bb. iv CONTENTS Page BASIS FOR