| 24-7238 |
William Douglas Cope v. Kentucky |
Kentucky |
2025-05-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection reproductive-rights state-legislation |
Question not identified. |
| 24A1055 |
Anthony Lemicy v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-05-01 |
Presumed Complete |
|
abortion-rights constitutional-privacy due-process equal-protection fundamental-rights reproductive-freedom |
Question not identified. |
| 24A492 |
Oscar Stilley v. John Thurston, Arkansas Secretary of State, et al. |
Arkansas |
2024-11-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
abortion-rights election-law initiative-petition signature-verification standing-doctrine state-constitutional-amendment |
Question not identified. |
| 24-57 |
Coalition Life v. City of Carbondale, Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-07-18 |
Denied |
Amici (11)Relisted (9) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process first-amendment free-speech public-debate public-forum supreme-court-precedent |
Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. Colorado. |
| 22-7800 |
Mac Truong v. Richard Michael DeWine, Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-06-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech intellectual-property pro-se-litigation standing standing-doctrine |
Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of… |
| 22-7743 |
Mac Truong v. Kevin Stitt, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-violation copyright copyright-law due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech standing |
Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of … |
| 22-951 |
Jane Doe No. 1, et al. v. Todd Rokita, Attorney General of Indiana, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-03-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-law dobbs-precedent dobbs-v-jackson first-amendment free-exercise free-speech medical-protocols religious-beliefs |
Whether, following Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022), this Court's First Amendment precedents continue to apply to … |
| 21-588 |
United States v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-22 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (20) |
abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process judicial-review preemption preliminary-injunction sovereign-immunity standing state-law supreme-court-precedent |
Question not identified. |
| 21-587 |
Penny Clarkston v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-583 |
Stephen Brint Carlton, et al. v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent texas-law |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-582 |
Mark Lee Dickson v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review reproductive-rights severability standing stare-decisis state-law supreme-court-precedent |
1. Should the Court overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)?
2. Should th… |
| 21-3 |
Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. v. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-07-02 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights down-syndrome due-process eugenic eugenic-abortion gestational-age reproductive-rights roe-v-wade state-regulation |
Missouri's House Bill 126 ("HB 126"), enacted in 2019, prohibits medical providers from performing abortions when the provider knows that the sole rea… |
| 20-1434 |
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al. v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-04-13 |
GVR |
Amici (8)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights disability down-syndrome due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment medical-ethics prenatal-diagnosis selective-abortion state-prohibition |
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment bars States from prohibiting abortions that are sought solely because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. |
| 20-1375 |
Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-04-01 |
GVR |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights best-interests civil-rights constitutional-privacy constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bypass minor-consent minors parental-notification parental-rights |
When a court permits an unemancipated minor to
have an abortion, may the State require that her parents be notified before the abortion occurs except
… |
| 20-6653 |
Scott P. Roeder v. Kansas |
Kansas |
2020-12-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-review personhood roe-v-wade standing |
Whether the notion of overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), includes other possibilities besides leaving abortion up to the states?
Whether t… |
| 20-482 |
Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General of Tennessee, et al. v. Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-10-14 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge covid-19 covid-19-order executive-order medical-procedures mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing |
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), this Court should vacate the Sixth Circuit's judgment and remand with ins… |
| 20-385 |
Judy Doe v. Michael L. Parson, Governor of Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge due-process establishment-clause free-exercise free-exercise-clause religious-belief religious-liberty undue-burden undue-burden-standard |
1. Is the Establishment Clause violated by
the proclamation in an abortion statute that "The life of
each human being begins at conception. Abortion w… |
| 20-305 |
Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, et al. v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-rights covid-19 due-process executive-order judicial-review mandamus mootness |
The Governor of Texas, in reliance on the COVID 19 pandemic, issued an executive order that banned nearly all abortions in Texas for at least a month,… |
| 19-816 |
Kristina Box, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-12-27 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-bypass minor-consent minors parental-consent parental-notification standing third-party-standing |
For decades Indiana has permitted a minor to have an abortion so long as she has parental consent or a bypass order from a juvenile court based on eit… |
| 19-677 |
Dave Yost, et al. v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-11-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
42-usc-1988 abortion-providers abortion-rights article-iii article-iii-standing attorney-fees civil-rights patient-rights preliminary-injunction prevailing-party standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Do abortion providers have Article III standing to assert the rights of their patients?
2. When, if ever, does a plaintiff who wins a preliminary … |
| 18-1323 |
June Medical Services L.L.C., et al. v. Stephen Russo, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-04-19 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (20) |
abortion abortion-rights admitting-privileges constitutional-law due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent undue-burden whole-woman's-health whole-womans-health womens-health |
Whether the Fifth Circuit's decision upholding Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hosp… |
| 18-1019 |
Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-02-04 |
GVR |
Amici (9)Relisted (7) |
abortion-regulation abortion-rights circuit-conflict due-process fetal-life fourteenth-amendment informed-consent maternal-health pre-enforcement-challenge ultrasound ultrasound-requirement |
May a State, consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least eighteen hours before an abortion? |
| 18-837 |
Scott Harris, in His Official Capacity as State Health Officer, et al. v. West Alabama Women's Center, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (11) |
abortion abortion-ban abortion-rights constitutional-challenge dismemberment due-process gonzales-v-carhart medical-debate medical-procedure partial-birth-abortion reproductive-rights state-law state-regulation unborn-child |
Whether a state ban on dismemberment abortions is unconstitutional where there is a reasonable medical debate that alternatives to the banned procedur… |