| 24-7238 |
William Douglas Cope v. Kentucky |
Kentucky |
2025-05-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection reproductive-rights state-legislation |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6782 |
R. R. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Child Protective Services, et al. |
West Virginia |
2024-02-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
adoption-rights child-abuse child-neglect child-welfare constitutional-rights due-process expedient-measures family-disintegration family-law grandparental-standing state-legislation |
1) Has disintegration of the traditional family leading to substantial increases in child neglect and
abuse cases caused agencies dealing with these … |
| 22-5932 |
Nick Casavelli, et ux. v. Donna Johanson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gary T. Johanson, Deceased |
Arizona |
2022-10-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-justice administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-preemption legislative-standard service-of-process standing state-legislation substantive-review vexatious-litigant |
Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate constitutional rights?
If the State of Arizona can legally apply the Arizona Re… |
| 21-463 |
Whole Woman's Health, et al. v. Austin Reeve Jackson, Judge, District Court of Texas, 114th District, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-28 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (9) |
abortion abortion-law civil-enforcement civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-review sovereign-immunity standing state-legislation |
The question presented is whether a State can insulate from federal-court review a law that prohibits the exercise of a constitutional right by delega… |
| 20-930 |
Karl Geppert v. Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration |
Maryland |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights driver's-license due-process federal-law real-id-act social-security social-security-number state-law state-legislation state-privilege |
The Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, authorized the issuance of social security numbers to applicants for federal benefits, but did not requir… |
| 19-6989 |
George Calvin Belt v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-12-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law child-support federal-authority federal-legislation federal-preemption state-authority state-law-conflict state-legislation state-statute supremacy-clause unemployment-benefits |
QUESTION 1.
A.
How it is possible that the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program
(hereinafter referred to as DOR CSP) can enf… |
| 19-372 |
William D. Jenkins, Jr., et ux. v. Corey Chance, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-09-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-courts judicial-power legislative-authority legislative-intent standing state-legislation statutory-construction statutory-interpretation supreme-court-jurisdiction |
Does This Court possess verifiable Constitutional and Congressional power to interpret unwritten Congressional Law and alleged Legislative "voids ".
… |
| 18-9167 |
Michael J. Pendleton v. Melissa Hainsworth, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset |
Pennsylvania |
2019-05-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment amendment-violation constitutional-rights contract-clause conviction-resentencing criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process ex-post-facto non-existent-crime state-federal-government state-legislation state-legislature substantive-due-process |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Violate Peritioner's Substantive Due $43 when it Convicted and Resentenced Htim For a Non-Existent Codified or Backed By … |
| 18-7289 |
Peter D. Bommerito v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment administrative-policy ballot-initiatives civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process public-policy state-legislation |
1. SHOULD THE PEOPLE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF INCREASINGLY SEVERE CR… |